One of the continuing themes running through many of the threads is the weakness of the AI.
The many claims of "it might be a good game if the AI was better"... or "I can't believe the AI did THAT" are numerious.
So let's talk. Let's point out every example we can find of a "BAD AI". Did it declare war on the wrong person, allow you to win a science victory by not building a space ship, having the AI build the UN when you had every CS in your pocket, giving you an easy victory... or something as STUPID as the auto path for units.
My favorite to date was in a high level game where I was getting killed in the science race... and as mentioned above, the AI built the UN, even though all but 2 of the remaining CS's were in my pocket. I was going for a culture win and was kind of pissed when I got the UN victory (I turn that victory condition off
now) but what the heck, a victory is a victory. But just how stupid can the AI get.
What's your story?
The many claims of "it might be a good game if the AI was better"... or "I can't believe the AI did THAT" are numerious.
So let's talk. Let's point out every example we can find of a "BAD AI". Did it declare war on the wrong person, allow you to win a science victory by not building a space ship, having the AI build the UN when you had every CS in your pocket, giving you an easy victory... or something as STUPID as the auto path for units.
My favorite to date was in a high level game where I was getting killed in the science race... and as mentioned above, the AI built the UN, even though all but 2 of the remaining CS's were in my pocket. I was going for a culture win and was kind of pissed when I got the UN victory (I turn that victory condition off
now) but what the heck, a victory is a victory. But just how stupid can the AI get.
What's your story?
Comment