Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roll Call: Are you playing Civ V?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    dont have it, dont plan on getting till/if i hear better overall experience from users.

    Comment


    • #17
      Don't have it, don't plan on getting it any time soon. Might wait till a few patches after the first expansion pack, and see if it is worthwhile then.

      Plus I don't much care for steam, which makes the bar that civ 5 has to reach to be purchase-worthy that little bit higher.

      Comment


      • #18
        I don't have it yet, probably won't get it... would like to though. Some of the changes look interesting.

        Comment


        • #19
          Another vote for "downloaded the demo, and it is painfully slow on my computer". From what I've read so far, I'm not trotting out to buy a new machine just to play this game.

          Comment


          • #20
            Got it, played a couple game. This preview seems neat, I think I will enjoy the full game when it is released in a few years.
            "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
            Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

            Comment


            • #21
              I have it and am playing it -

              Sporadically. I'll find myself playing for an evening, and then not picking it up for another 10 days, and playing other things instead.

              I suspect that as with Civ IV it won't fully grab my attention until it has been polished by a year or so of patches and expansions.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Jaybe View Post
                My basic problem with civ5: I'm LOSING 3-4 times as often as I did with civ4.
                Wow! That's the first time I've seen that complaint! Mostly I see people saying that the game isn't a challenge unless you handicap yourself in some way. [I'm sorry if that seemed like a criticism, I'm getting enough challenge for my tastes!]
                "...your Caravel has killed a Spanish Man-o-War."

                Comment


                • #23
                  Civ5 not yet 2 months. I guess Jaybe not speaking about his victories/defeats on civ4 in its first 2 months...
                  Experience...not just from one own games but also (and more important) from other people posts.
                  Very few posts about strategy indeed (well, I made none); not a good signal.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Hermann the Lombard View Post
                    Wow! That's the first time I've seen that complaint! Mostly I see people saying that the game isn't a challenge unless you handicap yourself in some way. [I'm sorry if that seemed like a criticism, I'm getting enough challenge for my tastes!]
                    That's just because some strategies people are used to doing do not work anymore. Others work better. Balance is off.
                    "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                    Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I play it in bursts, but don't feel obsessed to fire it up constantly.
                      And indeed there will be time To wonder, "Do I dare?" and, "Do I dare?". t s eliot

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by fed1943 View Post
                        Civ5 not yet 2 months. I guess Jaybe not speaking about his victories/defeats on civ4 in its first 2 months...
                        Experience...not just from one own games but also (and more important) from other people posts.
                        Very few posts about strategy indeed (well, I made none); not a good signal.
                        While civ5 is not 'mature' yet, it may also be true that players of the game haven't got a solid handle on strats yet, which may be a GOOD signal.

                        Personally, I've come to the conclusion that I'm just not aggressive enough towards my neighbors. Which results in low scores or losses (especially when a civ on the other continent reaches critical mass and goes on a conquering spree).

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I voted bananas. I dont have it (due to my issues with the security of the Steam Client), and may never have it, despite my desire to play it.
                          We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
                          If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
                          Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Jaybe View Post
                            While civ5 is not 'mature' yet, it may also be true that players of the game haven't got a solid handle on strats yet, which may be a GOOD signal.
                            i lost my first game, and won every game since up to the one below deity. i'm pretty sure i could beat that one by early rapid expansion, and with an archipelago map. that way, the AI's bonuses are offset, and an AI deficiency is exploited (naval activities).

                            the key is getting a hang for what to do and what not (how/where to expand, what to research first, etc). i hope future versions of Civ5 will decrease the AI's bonuses at higher levels, and significantly increase its comprehension of proper long-term strategy and battle tactics.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Zoetstofzoetje View Post
                              i lost my first game, and won every game since up to the one below deity. i'm pretty sure i could beat that one by early rapid expansion, and with an archipelago map. that way, the AI's bonuses are offset, and an AI deficiency is exploited (naval activities).
                              So you are saying that if you played other than archipelago you could have more of a challenge, or even perhaps enjoy the game more (hint, hint, nudge, nudge)?
                              I don't play the game to manipulate the AI in most cases (except when desperate). Once I am comfortable with the game, I'll even play by 'house rules' to avoid exploiting the AI (again, desperation excluded).

                              I've never played archipelago with any of the civ series. It's always been some sort of continents (continents, terra, or the perfectworld2 maspscript for civ4). I think I may have played pangaea only once or twice. More immersion for me that way.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Jaybe View Post
                                So you are saying that if you played other than archipelago you could have more of a challenge, or even perhaps enjoy the game more (hint, hint, nudge, nudge)?
                                Nope! I haven't abused this yet! I'm just saying that with deity the AI bonuses are so big that I would see it as the only way.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X