It's not Firaxis' decision. PI is both dev and publisher, Firaxis is only dev.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would you buy Civ5 if it was only offered on Steam?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostBut feel free to rag on Steam because your ISP sucks
Originally posted by Ming View PostBut seriously... what difference does it really make. I'm not a big fan of steam, but I'll be damned if I let that effect my decision on whether I want a game or a not.
About the only positive argument for Steam is about multiplayer. The others are just saying it's not that bad, like not being terribly bad is an achievement of some sort.Seriously. Kung freaking fu.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zealot View PostYou don't change your ISP because they had a fire in the Exchange building and took 4 days to recover their services.
If you don't understand the difference it makes then this discussion isn't for you Ming. What I think is pretty obvious with the question of this thread is if you're actually so ticked off by the game being only for sale on Steam, if you'll pirate the game.
Because rest assured Ming, everyone here WILL play the game.
And if what you are claiming is that you will STEAL the game because it isn't available in a format you like, but is acceptable to many, I think that says a lot about you.
Being available only on Steam doesn't seem like a reasonable reason to steal the game to me. At the end of the day, it's still theft.
I can't emphasise enough how Paradox' system is the most user friendly. If you buy the disc you get an online copy as well.
If Firaxis did the same, allowed us to play offline without Internet connection, and yet allow us to register a version of the same game we paid for in Steam if we want to, enjoying all the benefits that Steam has like Multiplayer, how could we possibly complain?
In fact, why wouldn't Firaxis want to do this?
There are many different ways for publishers to distribute their games. For BUSINESS reasons, they make what they think are the best choices. I would personally like to buy the game from D2D, because I've had the best experience with them, and I think their customer service is superior. But I hated gamespy. So while Steam isn't my favorite choice, I'm not going to whine and say I'm not going to buy the game... or say I'm going to steal it.
If I really want the game, I will buy it regardless of the distribution method.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
I had problems connecting the other day. I just opened steam and selected play offline and had absolutely no problems playing. I don't know what people here are talking about. I'm not a fan of steam, but the crap people are saying here is an over reaction. More games are going this path so people are going to have to get used to it or do without a legitimate copy.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostI had problems connecting the other day. I just opened steam and selected play offline and had absolutely no problems playing. I don't know what people here are talking about. I'm not a fan of steam, but the crap people are saying here is an over reaction. More games are going this path so people are going to have to get used to it or do without a legitimate copy.
Comment
-
-
One other nice/bad thing about steam is they offer limited time offer demos on games. They're not stripped down versions of the game. So if you like you can try them and be bored by them by the time the trial period is over.
Some consider it annoying that you're notified that they're available when you log in, but it's not a big deal and I actually like one of them that I tried. I would never have tried it otherwise.
GET OVER IT.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
And what about slow Internet?
Hey guys, I'm a Civ player that doesn't post here often. This thread has me a little worried.
What about the people who have incredibly slow Internet connections? How will they acquire the game, if they have to download the entire thing with Steam?
My father has a maximum download speed of 20Kb/s. And it's a marginal-quality wireless connection...prone to disconnects. How long will that take to download the game? Could it even be done in a reasonable time-frame?
And yes, he DOES play CIV. And it's a desktop, not a laptop, so driving to a fast hotspot isn't likely. Any other counter-arguments I need to address? I've had some time to think this through...
Why can't a physical disk be available in stores at all? Not everyone is blessed with high-speed Internet access.-------------------------------------------
There is no teacher but the enemy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostI had problems connecting the other day. I just opened steam and selected play offline and had absolutely no problems playing. I don't know what people here are talking about. I'm not a fan of steam, but the crap people are saying here is an over reaction. More games are going this path so people are going to have to get used to it or do without a legitimate copy.
1) I am casual gamer, I do not play games each day, STEAM is not running on my computer constantly, so if I want to run Civ, I would have to run STEAM first (even if it is done automatically). That means I have to wait, when steam runs, loggs me into their websites, checks for updates for this and other games, takes resources from my computer, and only then launches the game. And when I end the game, I have to manually open steam window and exit from steam to free computer resources. It is a hassle that I do not need.
2) Steam updates itself from time to time (quite often actually). The problem is that it can download update, but it would need to be shutdown to install the update. Next time when it starts (when I decide to play another game, which can be in a week), it connects to internet, and installs update. Internet connection is required for that. On couple occasions I could not play game because of that because my internet connection went down and steam would not be able to install the update, and I, of course, would not be able to turn on offline mode, because steam would not run without finishing update installation! One time I could not play for a week during my vacation because of the storm and flood in our area killing my ISP for long time.
Yeah, sure, my ISP was bad in terms of down time, but at the time, it was the only high speed internet available to me.
These are the two things of why I do not want to buy games on steam. Impulse, Gamersgate are much better, I always check those sites first before STEAM.
That said, I still prefer Steam to CD (if you have to insert it each time to play)The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russell
Comment
-
Can't you just keep it in offline mode. I did that for awhile and since I had it set not to launch at startup, when I wanted to play a game. Click steam, it would launch in less than a couple of seconds since it didn't have to connect. AND since it's not connected it's not searching for updates. When done, it takes about 2 seconds to shut it down. I don't see how 4 to 5 seconds is any kind of real inconvenience for playing a game. Loading a CD takes much longer.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostCan't you just keep it in offline mode.
Originally posted by rah View PostWhen done, it takes about 2 seconds to shut it down.
Originally posted by rah View PostLoading a CD takes much longer.The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russell
Comment
Comment