Tweet
Originally posted by Nikolai
Battleships in 4000 BC?
I've never seen that. Might it be because I never played higher than Prince?
Battleships in 4000 BC?
I've never seen that. Might it be because I never played higher than Prince?
-
At any difficulty level that seems very improbable.Haven't been here for ages.... -
Civ1: can't be modded
Civ2: excessive exploits; ICS, etc
Civ3: game is linear- yes there are the different national advantages for more choices, but these are choices made at the start, from which a predetermined course is proceeded on. The tech tree doesn't help.
CTP1: Not that much to complain about, I like the future stuff.
CTP2: Lots of bugsVisit First Cultural Industries
There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General LuddComment
-
CTP2: Lots of bugs
Not anymore *shameless plug*Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking ManComment
-
Civ 3: Systematically crashes on Emperor on my system when I reach modern age.Clash of Civilization team member
(a civ-like game whose goal is low micromanagement and good AI)
web site http://clash.apolyton.net/frame/index.shtml and forum here on apolyton)Comment
-
Hardly Civ3's fault.
Comment
-
Civ I: Too old!
Civ II: Dreary end-game. Conquest-style victories boring to plough through, especially after tech has been maxed out.
Civ II Multiplayer Gold: AI too keen to gang up as one on you if you get ahead on it.
Civ III: Loathsome interface, interface sound effects and civilopedia graphics.
SMAC: Sci-fi tosh.
CtP: Derivative, unnecessary tosh.A fact, spinning alone through infospace. Without help, it could be lost forever, because only THIS can turn it into a News.Comment
-
Is that even mathematically possible?The sons of the prophet were valiant and bold,
And quite unaccustomed to fear,
But the bravest of all is the one that I'm told,
Is named Abdul Abulbul AmirComment
-
I assume you are referring to the battleships in 4000 BC. No, not a standard game, I don't believe so.Originally posted by lajzar
Is that even mathematically possible?Haven't been here for ages....Comment
-
CIV3- The inability to combine workers into some sort of worker gang.
CIV3-Inability to change a Civilizations name when a PBEM is started.
C3C-Corruption model is less than desireable. FP is not powerfulenough. Im not asking for RCP back, Im just asking that the FP again be something more usefull like in PtW.
Civ3_Difficult modding*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
Civ1: Annoying caravans/spys
Civ2: Annoying caravans/spys, was played in a window
Civ3: Lousy governments, feature bugs (culture flipping, etc)
Ctp1/2: Bugs, too much micromanagement (annoying trade system, PW, etc)
SMAC: Colors, too much micromanagement with unit-creationThis space is empty... or is it?Comment
-
It's been a long time, but were there spies in Civ1?Originally posted by Adagio
Civ1: Annoying caravans/spys
So was Civ1.Civ2: Annoying caravans/spys, was played in a window
Last edited by Nikolai; January 11, 2005, 16:04.Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
Also active on WePlayCiv.Comment
-
What was Civ1?This space is empty... or is it?Comment
-
Windowed.
EDIT: Or at least so was the first version I played.Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
Also active on WePlayCiv.Comment
-
as in annoying caravans and spies
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
No it wasn't... Amiga doesn't have Windows
Never tried the PC version of the game, so I have no idea how different it was from the Amiga version...This space is empty... or is it?Comment
Comment