well?
Do you own Civ2?
Should I bother?
comments?
I've heard more negative than positive
Do you own Civ2?
Should I bother?
comments?
I've heard more negative than positive
As advantages to CTP, I would point the units sounds, battle screen and units diversity, including many special units.
As poor fetures of CTP, i point the complicated direction system (you always have units that wakes up when you don't want, there is no automation to help the player)
the poorest feature of SMAC is the units sounds, you will get bored soon of the too few sounds. Also, the modular system of units design is a good idea, but it ends up with very few different unit types (and they all look the same : the submarine looks just like the cruiser, and the carrier has nearly no differences.). Also, the unavoidable eco-damages keeps ennoying me.
However SMAC also brings a host of nice features : the automation is good (automated exploration, formers even thought they lack an auto plant forests option, the governors...) this saves many time for important things. Also, the four ways of victory are good. The borders of nations clearly appear ulike in CTP. I like the social engeeniring too, you clearly know what you choose, not only some good or bad adjective you don't know what they mean. The different factions, with different stenghts and weakness are a great feature of SMAC. Finally, SMAC has an epic dimension that lacks CTP, through those interlude texts, you really feel like you'r exploring an alien world, sad that those interlude are the same for all factions though.
Comment