Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Things I'd Like To See Next

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Things I'd Like To See Next

    Well it doesn't sound like there's going to be very many changes made in the editor next patch, so it looks like we'll have to wait until the next expansion pack. So I figured I'd put in my wish list now, so maybe I'll get a present or two next Christmas. Or the one after, who knows. Anyway:

    1. I would like the wonder flag, "Resources Required in City Radius" moved to the general flags for improvements. I could do alot with new improvements if that were the case.

    2. I'd like to see a flag that prevented an improvement from being built in a particluar city size. For instance, I think it's a bit silly that I can build a University in a dinky little Town that only has a population of three. That type of structure should only be built in a City or Metropolis. And Research Lab could be set for only Metropolis, etc.

    3. For Luxuries, as well as being able to select when they appear on the map, I would like to have the option of making them disappear as well, or at least have them become bonus resources. People's ideas of what luxuries are has changed slightly in the last 6000 years.

    4. I would like to have an option that prevented a particular gov type from using a specific building. For instance, a Communist government should not get any benefit from a Cathedral, and shouldn't be allowed to build one. All the others can however.

    5. I would like to see the flag "Replaces Improvements with this Flag Checked" expanded so that it can be used by other building lines. Or at least something like the "Rendered Obsolete By:" only for buildings, not techs.

    6. I'd like to have access to those four pull down menus at the top when making a small wonder.

    7. Instead of just being able to select whether an improvement makes people Happy/Unhappy, I would like the ability of making someone Content as well.

    8. I would like to have an "Irrigate To" command for my Workers instead of the current "Ctrl-I". This would be much more effective if I could select where to send the irrigation.

    9. The ability to add new Eras.

    10. The ability to set the Railroad movement rate.

    11. Instead of having several different types of centralized corruption, and just one of communal, I'd like to see these functions split in two. So there'd be a flag each for a Centralized or Communal model, then a second set that would select the severity for each. This would make it much easier for adding different gov types.

    12. Just like now we can override the movement penalty of a terrain, I'd like to be able to override the defensive bonus. So that a Archer/Longbowman would get a bonus in a Forest, but the Horseman/Knight wouldn't. All overrides would be set to the value for Grassland.

  • #2
    Amen.

    I would also like adding units to be made easier. I hate having to modivy civpedia text and the like all the time, I think it should be easier.

    Alos, I would like two seperate invisible flags, one for land and one for sea (with their corresponding "see invisible" too). This will keep invisible land units from bieng detected by ships, and visa versa.
    "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

    Comment


    • #3
      Agreed to a lot of the mentioned points.
      Now it's my turn ...

      1) Separation from land and sea bombardment (maybe by adding the option 'naval bombardment only') in order to improve the use of submarines. I'd very much like to lower their A/D-values and give them bombardment instead (get the torpedoes out and then hide from the hunters), but without my wish-flag the AI would mainly use a bombard-value to destroy tile improvements, which should not be possible with torpedoes.

      2) Ability to restrict a unit's movement to tiles with rails, so you could implement armoured trains and (especially) railwayguns (I love those things).

      3) Ability to raid trade routes as it was possible with CTP. That's not easy with Civ's trade system, which I like very much, but it would enable real trade wars and make the privateer more useful.

      4) Set a unit's maintenance cost. I think, an aircraft carrier should be a little bit more expensive to maintain than a galley or a warrior. Additionally this would allow to implement mercenaries: Units with low production, but very high maintenance cost.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, I am in complete agreement with all of the future editor suggestions that have been written here . To this list, I'd also like to add the following:

        1) Events Scripting (Obviously).

        2) The Ability to make units dependant on the presence of Wonders and/or improvements (i.e. giving a unit a building prerequisite instead of, or as well as, a resource and tech prerequisite!)

        3) Ability to add/edit terrain improvements, so that we can have things like more advanced mines in later ages, as well as advanced farms etc.

        4) On a non-Editor note, Civil War would also be nice to see back in the game, as well as advanced diplomacy options!

        Yours,
        The_Aussie_Lurker

        Comment


        • #5
          1) Make the AI willing to sell cities in peace time
          2) Event/Diplo Scripting
          3) Firaxis made scenarios

          Comment


          • #6
            Oh yeah! I'd like to be able to add disease to more terrain types. It might be interesting to have the Black Plaque sweep through my empire once in awhile.

            Comment


            • #7
              1. The removal of icon sheets so that units, resources, pop heads, buildings etc, simply use individual files.

              2. The units tab of the editor should have sections for inputting pedia text and pathnames for pedia icons, but being able to do so in plain english w/o worrying about stuff like PRTO, # or ^. In fact, that should probably go for all the tabs. If that takes up too much space, then a button with a pop-up asking you to type the stuff in.

              3. The diplomacy text should be restructured so that it isn't reliant on knowing how many civs there are. That way you wouldn't need to mess about with that horrible string text when you add a new civ.

              4. The AI should stop patrolling. The number of times I've seen AI units moving back and forwards to and from the same tiles...it's ridiculous and causes a huge drain on system resources.

              5. Be able to spilt your territory into regions. A good way would be to simply select one city, the city(/ies) closest to it and say they make up a new region. A box pops up asking for the region name. Simple

              6. The ability to set whether or not a transport unit can itself be loaded onto other transports (like helicopters onto carriers). I imagine you'd need 2 load flags, then.

              P.S. I think asking for AI scripting and events timeline in a patch is a bit much
              Up the Irons!
              Rogue CivIII FAQ!
              Odysseus and the March of Time
              I think holding hands can be more erotic than 'slamming it in the ass' - Pekka, thinking that he's messed up

              Comment


              • #8
                7. The ability to add new culture groups.

                8. The ability to choose which tile improvements and city improvements are era-specific.

                9. It is possible to make any unit era-specific. However, as far as I know, it is not possible to have era specific icons for them (apart form the settler, worker, leader and army).

                10. Be able to let each civ have it's own set of advisors. I'm not asking Firaxis to make them all, I'm just asking for the ability to make and add my own.

                11. A box, similar to the Ignore Move Cost box, which would give a combat bonus to the unit when fighting from that terrain.

                12. The Terraform AI strategy should still be checkable even if a unit is given less than the full compliment of worker actions.
                Last edited by zulu9812; December 20, 2002, 12:49.
                Up the Irons!
                Rogue CivIII FAQ!
                Odysseus and the March of Time
                I think holding hands can be more erotic than 'slamming it in the ass' - Pekka, thinking that he's messed up

                Comment


                • #9
                  13. Fix this damn black screen bug! It's been there since the game was released and still hasn't been fixed. It's been discussed here, here and here

                  14. The AI should make use of mobile aircraft.

                  15. Ground units should be able to use air missions w/o doing wierd things like flak units flying through the air on intercept missions. Although, I think this probably involves a change to the format of the INI file, with dedicated lines for intercept, recon, etc.

                  16. The game engine should automatically draw the lines between techs. Yep, you heard me correctly; that way we don't have to mess about with the pcx files and can just add techs with the editor.

                  17. Being able to move units, techs, buildings, etc. up and down the list would be handy since that affects it's position on the in-game build list.

                  18. Be able to set whether or not a fast unit will retreat on a percentage chance, or will always retreat.

                  19. A land Transport AI strategy flag would be nice (and obviously the AI be able to use it )

                  20. Remove the 1 unit per turn per airport limit on airlifting.
                  Up the Irons!
                  Rogue CivIII FAQ!
                  Odysseus and the March of Time
                  I think holding hands can be more erotic than 'slamming it in the ass' - Pekka, thinking that he's messed up

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'd really, really like to see a "View" mode. It gets annoying accidentally sending a unit off to the other side of the world, when all I wanted to do was have a look around.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      ABILITY to change Communal level of corruption.

                      To set how much is it corrupt (some sort of slider).

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Archers/ longbowmen are, like knights, inefective in trees

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          21. The scenario search folders feature should be extended so that you can use it to select more specific folders. The problem was discussed here here

                          22. Artillery on auto-bombard should override the normal reaction to wake when next to an enemy unit (when that preference is turned on). Since catapults and cannon have to be next to an enemy in the first place, that makes auto-bombard a bit useless really. It was discussed here

                          23. The AI should be more aggressive to civs of a shunned government.
                          Up the Irons!
                          Rogue CivIII FAQ!
                          Odysseus and the March of Time
                          I think holding hands can be more erotic than 'slamming it in the ass' - Pekka, thinking that he's messed up

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Big Fish
                            Archers/ longbowmen are, like knights, inefective in trees
                            I disagree. Archers were used quite often in ambushes, with them hiding in the trees. They can easily hide in brambles, thickets etc. that the Knight would have a hard time getting through. And anyone on foot in a dense forest will be more manueverable among the trees than a horse will. Quite often the forest will be so dense that the rider will even have to dismount.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I also want to see scrolling windows for the resources in the city view. It's ugly as crap seeing the ones I've added spreading across the top of the screen. That would no doubt save us from the odd crash as well, since I'm convinced that with to many the game crashes.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X