Tweet
Again, I recommend trying out Random.
-
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok -
If the poll was still open, i would have voted for militaristic. It seems to help me out more than any other trait does on higher difficulty levels. militaristic gets more armies, and armies seem to be so powerful now....Comment
-
Funny. I tend to find Mil the weakest trait.Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- ElokComment
-
Playing a non-industrious civ, just let your settler-pump(s) pump out workers instead of settlers, once you don't need that many settlers, and let them do that for the rest of the game(!). You can always add them to other cities later on.
I prefer religious (I play vanilla Civ III, so I don't know what agricultural is). That's because of cheap (early) temples/cathedrals and easy government shifts (allows Desp.->(Mon.->)->Republic->Demo->(Communism) instead of just Desp->Republic.)Comment
-
You need militaristic trait on higher difficulty levels if you wish to live.
Other than that, I consider religious nearly an exploit at higher levels, because if I'm not religious, I find it very difficult to switch out of despotism.Comment
Comment