come on, cast your vote!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Favorite Conquest Poll: Vote Now!
Collapse
X
-
Favorite Conquest Poll: Vote Now!
203Mesopotamia7.39%15Rise of Rome22.17%45Fall of Rome2.96%6Middle Ages15.27%31Mesoamerica6.40%13Age of Discovery12.81%26Sengoku: Sword of the Shogun13.79%28Napoleonic Europe10.34%21War in the Pacific8.87%18Co-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blogTags: None
-
My favorite is the Age of Discovery, though not for the SP version. The SP version is too easy even at the really high levels as the AI can't grasp the necessity of treasure units. Where this conquest shines is in PBEM games. Playing against other humans, along with the roleplay value of this conquest, is what makes this one fun for me. That's why I'm in three different PBEMs playing this conquest including The Grand Passage.
-
I'm voting for the Sengoku Conquest. I like how the units, tech-tree, and improvements are different from from the regular western world ones, and also how you have to start your tribe from scratch, instead of working with a pre-built nation.I AM.CHRISTIAN
Comment
-
Mesoamerica!. I recommend to you people to read the civilopedia entries of that scenario.. it have some nice info about us... erm, about our ancients.
Fortune and Glory, here I come!!!.
Indiana Jones
Spanish Empire Civ for Civilization 5 (in Spanish/en Español)
Comment
-
read the civilpedia entry for spaceship in the WW2 pacific scenario
I chose Age of Discovery. Although it is too easy on single player. But I just like it.
But Age of Discovery isn't my favourite by much.
I still enjoy the Fall of Rome and Middle Ages alot.
I'll have to mess with Sengoku some more. I have only played it once so far, but I won so early, I didn't get a chance to mess around with the later techs and units.
WW2 Pacific is decent. Same with Rise of Rome. Rise of Rome just takes so long and has so many units. Mesopotamia is a good quickie scenario. And Mesoamerican is still pretty good. Napoleonic Europe I have to play again as well. My first time through I neglected diplomacy- big mistake. It was tough battling every single country in Europe.
Comment
-
Mesoamerica is the perfect conquest for a PBEM. Tech tree, units, wonders, terrain & victory conditions are very different from the epic game, it is very funny to playCampeón 2006 Progressive Games
civ4 mods: SCSCollateral GrayAgainstBlue ProperCrossings
civ3 terrain: Irrigations Roads Railroads Borders Multimine Sengoku Napoleonic
Comment
-
Yeah, and it's also very fun to play if you won on it, right Niessuh?
Fortune and Glory, here I come!!!.
Indiana Jones
Spanish Empire Civ for Civilization 5 (in Spanish/en Español)
Comment
-
Middle Ages all the way! It is a great scenario (for warmongers). The various factions have different ways of playing and winning. This one can be replayed a bunch of times without it feeling the same.
Having said that, there isn't much chance of a peaceful builder winning.Seemingly Benign
Download Watercolor Terrain - New Conquests Watercolor Terrain
Comment
-
I like the Middle Ages one the best probably. It's pretty much my favorite period of time in history (right up there with Rome), there are several play styles you can choose depending on what Civ you pick, and its good practice for warmongering which is good for someone like me, who sucks at it. :P
Mesopotamia and Mesoamerica are both really fun, but Mesopotamia is a bit too short and Mesoamerica is a bit too small. The Napoleonic Wars are also fun but not as fun as the others i mentioned.
Comment
Comment