I was disgusted, while playing the Mesoamerica scenario, to see the specific civilization characters used to portray the lesser powers such as the Toltecs and Olmecs. The fact that the developers used already-existing characters to stand for the lesser powers did not surprise me. What did was the fact that the developers chose to use all the non-white leaders to stand for them. I acknlowedge that the ancient leaders of the Mesoamerican powers were not white by our standards, but this is by no means a justification to generalize and use character pictures from the Zulus, Iroquoi, and Mongols, to name a few. This just lumps together all the non-white characters and assumes they can represent any other non-white character or people. I would like to hear people's comments on this. Thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Racist Undertones in Conquests
Collapse
X
-
They did a lot of skimping on artwork for Conquests in order to get the game released "on time." Frankly, since I pay almost no attention to leaderheads, I hadn't even noticed.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
-
I'm not sure where you got the idea that they skimped on the art to get the game out on time, Arrian? Unless you're referring to the city views which I can count the number of times I've looked at on one hand....
But lemme join the "Yer off yer rocker" chorus on this one. I would imagine that - if any thought was put into which leaderheads were chosen, which I doubt - they chose the typically "ancient culture" civilization leaderheads for Mesoamerica.
I sincerely doubt any racism was intended or expressed by the choices made there.
It's this sort of rampant political correctness rubbish that has me saying "Fireperson" and "policeperson" to my students in class now. :P (Not that I actually DO, mind you.)
Comment
-
Maybe you could consider that it may not have been an overt racist choice, but merely one of expedience. It is not always required that one does things like this because they are evil, sometimes they are thoughtless (not studid), careless or wrong.
So why not give them the benefit of the doubt, until you have a reason to do otherwise?
I mean do you really think they sat down to do this as a means of demeaning someone?
Comment
-
I'm not sure where you got the idea that they skimped on the art to get the game out on time, Arrian? Unless you're referring to the city views which I can count the number of times I've looked at on one hand...
I too think he's off his rocker, but was trying to say it more politely.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Comment
-
Metazoa is right, this smacks of the kind of racism that says white is pure and anything else is inferior so it's allright to jumble around the black and brown peoples. It's as if the blacks and browns have no definitive cultures of their own, which is exactly what Europeans thought for a long time."It takes you years to learn how to play like yourself." Miles Davis
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fried-Psitalon
I sincerely doubt any racism was intended or expressed by the choices made there.
It's this sort of rampant political correctness rubbish that has me saying "Fireperson" and "policeperson" to my students in class now. :P (Not that I actually DO, mind you.)
Let's not go back to "all the mud people look alike".
Get a clue people."It takes you years to learn how to play like yourself." Miles Davis
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by G'Kar
Metazoa is right, this smacks of the kind of racism that says white is pure and anything else is inferior so it's allright to jumble around the black and brown peoples. It's as if the blacks and browns have no definitive cultures of their own, which is exactly what Europeans thought for a long time.
To the OP: You're being a bit extreme, reactionary, and over-PC. (Another polite way of saying off your rocker.)
To G'Kar: In light of the lengthy descriptions of various civs in the 'pedia and the general attention to detail, your post more off-the-rocker PC tripe. Next you'll say that this is just like the Haitians thing in GTA, which was also daft.
It's a game, folks.
Just a game.
Get over yourselves and start a new game.
Or quit playing this one.
Or get an artist to mod in more accurate leaderheads.
Either way, Civ3 and its expansions are not a political or cultural statement.
It's a game.
"Just once, do me a favor, don't play Gray, don't even play Dark... I want to see Center-of-a-Black-Hole Side!!! " - Theseus nee rpodos
Comment
-
I think my Warmonger POV is interfering with my understanding of this silly thread and its impact on combat calculations and overall game balance.
In other words, gimme a break.The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.
Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Comment
-
Get a clue people.
So, even if you are right (which I do not necessarily concede, but I don't want to argue it), it's pretty silly to work up moral outrage over this.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Comment
Comment