Most annoying thing...

[alva]

how well do the other things work? like "emphasize production"?

That's the only one I use, but mainly for city growth, to put it more clear, for when a city grows.
You will get the shields from a "newborn" labourer, but not the food or gold, thus the governer putting it on a unroaded, unmined mountain is more lucrative the on fish for example.
Hey, sometimes every shield counts

[eric2075]

The governor does do well at managing citizen's moods during anarchy. That's the only time I use them. Probably shouldn't even use them then but it's a good lazy way out. After the new gov. is installed you just turn off the governor and fire the clowns.

[Shogun Gunner]

Originally posted by Tacit_Exit
You can't start a revolution if you have not researched a new Government

I think the problem is you can start a revolution without having researched a new gov't...perhaps you mean you shouldn't

[vmxa1]

I suspect you coudl start one, I am not sure what the point of it would be, if you do not know another form of government.
You would just get X turns of anarchy for nothing.

[Tacit_Exit]

Originally posted by Shogun Gunner I think the problem is you can start a revolution without having researched a new gov't...perhaps you mean you shouldn't

No, you CAN'T.

Try it with a new game; the Domestic Advisor states that 'We can't start a revolution until we discover different forms of government'.

Hence the

[Thoth]

It's a bit of a moot point.

Going into anarchy for a revolution to democracy

No one in their right mind would be that late in the game without some form of govt other than Despotism.

[Tassadar500]

There's alot of this I don't understand. Number one why are you only in Despotism and you have not researched any government technology that late in the game? Number two I thought you could only have a revolution if you had a government to choose from?

[vmxa1]

Most of the forms of governament are optional, so you can skip them and get to the next age. Not that I would recommend skipping all of them.

[Tacit_Exit]

Re: Most annoying thing...

Originally posted by Thoth
No one in their right mind would be that late in the game without some form of govt other than Despotism.

Originally posted by rebo
... realise i hadnt researched democracy or any new gov in the first place.

I don't know what 'moot' means where you come from.

[Thoth]

Re: Re: Most annoying thing...

Originally posted by Tacit_Exit




I don't know what 'moot' means where you come from.

Seems to mean "I read the first post too quickly"

[Tacit_Exit]

Re: Re: Re: Most annoying thing...

[Shogun Gunner]

Tacit_exit: Clearly you are right. You can't go to revolution unless you have researched one gov't past depotism. I guess I never tried to start a revolution without another gov't researched.

P.S. I did an image showing this, but couldn't figure out how to paste the graphic in the message. yes, I read vB Code help. yes, I still need help.


:find hammer: :find my head: >>>>>

[vmxa1]

Shogun Gunner if you use quick reply, you won;t be able to add an image.
If you use the post reply, tou will see a browse button. Use it to point to the image you want to psot. It requires that it have certain filetype and be under 500K (IIRC). This is best done with a JPEG file.

[Panag]

Re: Most annoying thing...

Originally posted by rebo
Going into anarchy for a revolution to democracy, 8 turns later most of my courthouses and temples are destroyed, get ready for the change then...

... realise i hadnt researched democracy or any new gov in the first place.

ARGHHHH

hi ,

and what else was going on , war , status of lux , etc , tell us all about it , ......

have a nice day

[Tassadar500]

Why the hell would that matter Panag?