Civs in Civ3: Conquests

[Jon Shafer]

This is fun.

[Underseer]

Originally posted by cronos_qc
But Canada a civ...
UU is WoodCutter: Worker working two times faster.
Or
"Courreurs de Bois": Scout with 2 of mov!!!!

I've said it before, but I think a Canadian special unit would almost have to be a king unit with an attack value (a la Chretien).

[History Guy]

Virdrago,

Franks are just Frenchmen as it is. One might as well have "Anglo-Saxons" and "Englishmen".

[Mr. President]

Originally posted by Quasar1011


Ashanti

You mean like the singer?

I thought that was something real - apparently I was right.

[Sheik]

Isreal should be in this time. If you want a mix of new and old Isreal is both. I think they are a must.

[cookieman]

the franks might be in, you already have some evolutionary civs in the game...i.e. sumerians->arabs->ottomans. since they already did this the franks could or another ancient civ could be in. but i personally think that would be ridiculous, the israelites definitely need to be in the game

[Tassadar500]

The Arabs, the Sumerians and the Ottomans were not evolutionary civs...

[cookieman]

im saying that eventually they all became one another, the sumerians actually fell under control of the babylonians but....in essence they all fell under control of the arabs, which fell under control of the ottomans

[volsang]

What about something to represent Australia, not the modern country, but the Aborigines. They claim with this xp. They want to have some interesting civ's. They would be it.

[Tassadar500]

But the Franks did not COUNQUER the French.

[Blaupanzer]

Originally posted by Nuclear Master
But the Franks did not COUNQUER the French.

Actually they did conquer the Gauls, then became the French. In any case they are represented by a civ in the current game.

[CrONoS]

Nuclear Master:
The Arabs, the Sumerians and the Ottomans were not evolutionary civs...

What do you means by that?

Dom,

[bobbo008]

all of europe's civs are very distinct. a lot of the mid-east civs are blurred and overlap.

[Zero]

Originally posted by bobbo008
all of europe's civs are very distinct. a lot of the mid-east civs are blurred and overlap.

maybe cause ur european?

[Rhothaerill]

I think this thread has kind of gotten a little off topic, but I'll add my 2 cents anyway. First off, I'm not claiming to be any type of history or middle east expert, but the way I understand it is such...historic Babylon is now Iraq, historic Persia is now Iran, and the Arabs are of course Saudi Arabia. Things look a little blurry to we in the U.S. and Europe because of the common religion of the area. But it's no different than how we all look to them because of our common religion.