I know most of us had great hopes for Civ III, gave it a try, and ended up returning here, preferring the detail and strategic depth of Civ II.
From the previews I read, it looks like Civ IV might have learned something from many of the problems associated with version III and may have ended up as a very enjoyable game.
I think I will try it, and have ordered a copy, but was wondering about the other Civ II stalwarts?
From the previews I read, it looks like Civ IV might have learned something from many of the problems associated with version III and may have ended up as a very enjoyable game.
I think I will try it, and have ordered a copy, but was wondering about the other Civ II stalwarts?
Comment