Well .... I´d like to do some nit-picking too if you two gentlemen do not mind after all ![Wink](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I do strongly believe that a possible WW3/enlengthened WW2 would have serious consequences on both sides of the Atlantic. For instance, official War Dept. documents from 1944/45 state it could possibly cost up to 500.000 G.I.s to invade and secure alone Honshu.
Considering D-Day never occurred there are two ways in my imagination about the huge U.S. industrial output and its weapons:
(1) The U.S. are sitting on loads and loads of their equipment which would have gone to Europe. Well, basically not to bad though the G.I.s would never have reported how bad the Shermans would have been doing against Tigers or Panthers - which would mean the U.S. equipment would have to be some kind of obsolete by then.
(This would be rather Red Front like, don´t you think so? I mean: Huge numbers of obsolete weaponry against the German Juggernaut.)
(2) Enlenghtened WW2/WW3 would have done the same thing to the U.S. society as fighting Hitler had done to the British society. I mean: instituting a universal draft, gung-ho patriotism (remember Churchill stating the Brits would fight on land, sea, air, beaches, etc and never surrender? I can imagine something like that.) If you look to what Britain was struggling with in the aftermath of real WW2 you can say it eroded its society I guess.
Concerning these points it would be highly possible the U.S. would adopt some kind of more autoritarian goverment style itself fighting on its homeland, maybe stating it would fight its 2nd War of Independence ...
Just some thoughts ...
![Wink](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I do strongly believe that a possible WW3/enlengthened WW2 would have serious consequences on both sides of the Atlantic. For instance, official War Dept. documents from 1944/45 state it could possibly cost up to 500.000 G.I.s to invade and secure alone Honshu.
Considering D-Day never occurred there are two ways in my imagination about the huge U.S. industrial output and its weapons:
(1) The U.S. are sitting on loads and loads of their equipment which would have gone to Europe. Well, basically not to bad though the G.I.s would never have reported how bad the Shermans would have been doing against Tigers or Panthers - which would mean the U.S. equipment would have to be some kind of obsolete by then.
(This would be rather Red Front like, don´t you think so? I mean: Huge numbers of obsolete weaponry against the German Juggernaut.)
(2) Enlenghtened WW2/WW3 would have done the same thing to the U.S. society as fighting Hitler had done to the British society. I mean: instituting a universal draft, gung-ho patriotism (remember Churchill stating the Brits would fight on land, sea, air, beaches, etc and never surrender? I can imagine something like that.) If you look to what Britain was struggling with in the aftermath of real WW2 you can say it eroded its society I guess.
Concerning these points it would be highly possible the U.S. would adopt some kind of more autoritarian goverment style itself fighting on its homeland, maybe stating it would fight its 2nd War of Independence ...
Just some thoughts ...
![Smile](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Comment