Lizzy's rise to greatness

[OzzyKP]

Eek, Maya and Egypt are already working together? This is very bad news.

[Dinner]

Indeed it is. But we are not responding.

[Dinner]

Also, we have exactly one siege weapon and you're not bothering to build more. Why not? As has been pointed out many, many times half of our army should be siege weapons yet you're not building any.

[mzprox]

We will trade 2-3 riflemen for 4-6 catapults (1 for 2 ratio). Also we are building sieges, but barracks have priority first. (most of the sieges wil lbe slaved anyway, but i did not want to start slaving in golden age).Basically if a city still builds anything which is not military unit it will finish that and then switch to units. (except the newer cities which need some basic buildings)
I hope we can assemble an army of 25 unit of infantries (rifles and janissaries) and 10-15 sieges (catapults and trebuchets)

[Dinner]

OK, I didn't know that. That plan will work and is much better than I thought we would manage.

I honestly was looking around and only saw 1 catapult and thought this is going to be the shortest offensive ever. Next question: How are they going to get them to us in the needed time frame without passing through the enemy's territory?

[mzprox]

timing could be a problem.. we will soon finish a galley in samsun which will carry these troops, also we will get a other galley from aztec which currently explores the mayan shores. then we do our best to exchange troops.

[Dinner]

Won't that take a very long time? It seems like just travel time there and back would be 20+ turns which is long outside of the time frame we had been talking about.

[mzprox]

it's enough to get into the closest city of aztecs (we can get there in about 3 turns from samsun), it's still not soo fast, I hope we can do at least two turns before the war starts.

[Dinner]

I'd still feel better if we built a few more siege engines as it seems like those ones we're planning on trading for won't be ready and in place in time to be of any use. Siege weapons would really help us maximize our tiny available force so that we don't lose units unnecissarially and since we still have six or so turns (maybe more) if we actually made the effort to build them we could do so and dramatically improve both our odds and our offensive abilities.

It seems dumb to not do so.

[Dinner]

Eek, Maya and Egypt are already working together? This is very bad news.

I cannot definatively say they are working together as yet but that seems more than probable; actually it is highly likely. I mean RB knows the three of us have all said we don't want to extend the NAP and magically, at the same time, the Maya decide it is time to start slaving a massive new (if not technologically up to date) army so the logical conclusion is the Maya have thrown in with RB. MZ has admitted the combined offensive against RB isn't going to amount to much and at most we'll get 1-2 cities and if we're lucky our allies will also get 1-2 tiny, over slaved cities, but it won't make it into the RB heartland so it seems that route is a dead end. If we want to win then we need to get big fast and the Maya offer the only reasonable way to do that. True, they have a large and growing macemen army and likely are working with RB (who we will be going to war with anyway) so why not just put a token force into the offensive against RB and instead put everything else we can muster into invading the Maya? At least that way we actually stand to gain something of substance and actually might improve our chances of winning the game.

To not do that seems like admitting we are not contenders and that we have no real chances of winning where as taking a big chunk of the Maya very well could put us in striking distance to the pole position. This is our do or admit defeat and die moment. We finally have the tech advantage for a few short turns so let's use it in a way which improves our position to the max. That means putting most of our efforts into taking Mayan cities since we can't take much from RB other than weak, over slaved Inca cities.

[Dinner]

Lastly, about trading units... Didn't RB insist on a rule that only one unit can be traded between civs per turn? No loading a ship full of units and then gifting the ship full of units to the other civ? That would seem to limit our ability to trade units in a timely manner.

[mzprox]

Maya and Egypt don't work together besides they have a common enemy. (they don't have open borders for example). But Maya still occupies many of cfc's troops.
We can't leave RB alone now.. without a nap with them we couldn't attack maya and RB wouldn't make a nap with all 3 of us, but then we can't allow RB to take out any of us. Besides it will be much harder to do anything with them once they have riflemen and cavalry.
I did some calculations about troop movements:
Now i believe our defense will be adequate by t170, but we will not be ready to start the attack, unless RB leavesour border not so well defended (even with roads it takes too long for our units to get from one side of our empire to the other). We however will be ready by t175 and that is the turn cfc can start with their attack too so we aim to this date. Hopefully RB will not have rifling by then.

There is no restriction on unit tradings.

[mzprox]

Just so you know: we are in the same turn for almost a week now.. wars and now multiple reloads make the game very slow.

[Hercules]

Here's some recent screen shots from this latest turn: focusing on Maya.

A lot of catapults and two separate armies build up: With a sizeable force in Chinook (not shown)

Also a power graph comparison.

What I am most disappointed in is the short window of opportunity of our military tech supremacy.

[Dinner]

It is as I feared. Planning to combat a Maya invasion must be part of our strategy and we must invade them while we still have the tech advantage.