Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Destiny of Empires [Diplo Game] [Organization Thread]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Inca (DoE)
    replied
    Down with the rule. It should be voluntary.

    Leave a comment:


  • Germany (DoE)
    replied
    Originally posted by Robert Plomp View Post
    48 hour vote:
    Who wants to get rid of the unimplemented "unit renaming rule"?
    If 10 playesr vote to get rid of it, I will not implement it after all.

    Please vote within 48 hours.
    If not 10 players supported the removal of the rule, I will implement it, and everybody should then also stick to it.
    Please get rid of that rule.

    PS I'd hate to be France changing those beautifully named units

    Leave a comment:


  • England (DoE)
    replied
    Vote here: http://plomp.eu/apolyton/doevoter.nsf

    Still waiting on China, Japan, Mali, Mongolia and the Zulu.

    Leave a comment:


  • China (DoE)
    replied
    help! where's the voting link?

    Leave a comment:


  • France (DoE)
    replied
    Get rid of it. More intrigue and diplo without it.

    And I don't want to have to rename my units - which have been individually named.

    Leave a comment:


  • Native America (DoE)
    replied
    I have no preference one way or the other. Dreamers never lie anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ottoman Empire (DoE)
    replied
    I vote to get rid of it. It's a pain, and its obvious who is getting what from who anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • America (DoE)
    replied
    I'm actually for keeping the rule in the game; units gifted by other countries would most of the time join armies as special regiments. It wouldn't often go unnoticed in the real world either if some country gifts another country troops.

    Leave a comment:


  • Russia (DoE)
    replied
    Ah, thanks for the swift response, RP. And yes - I came to the idea of PM after some half an hour. Not the quickest, nor the smartest, but at least it worked

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    It crashed, I'm loading it right now. I hope that I can use the autosave that was generated at your login.
    Couple of minutes please.

    Edit: game's up again. I used Russia's login-save, so nothing is lost.
    Thanks for the PM, Russia. That always works the best

    Leave a comment:


  • Russia (DoE)
    replied
    Can please someone confirm if the game is up or down?

    Leave a comment:


  • Russia (DoE)
    replied
    I think I made something to the server - while connecting my computer hanged and now it shows me logged in while I am not and while trying to connect, it cycles at "connected to host"

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    48 hour vote:
    Who wants to get rid of the unimplemented "unit renaming rule"?
    If 10 playesr vote to get rid of it, I will not implement it after all.

    Please vote within 48 hours.
    If not 10 players supported the removal of the rule, I will implement it, and everybody should then also stick to it.

    Leave a comment:


  • France (DoE)
    replied
    Originally posted by England (DoE) View Post
    Frog blood.
    Your anti-biodiversity stance is duly noted.

    Leave a comment:


  • France (DoE)
    replied
    Originally posted by India (DoE) View Post
    question then regarding the upgrading of another civ's units: how should this be arranged?
    I am going to be putting a NU added on to the name of my units. NU will stand for Neandor Upgrade. Unlike my opponents who accept mercenary units, I have built all my units myself and paid for their upgrades.

    The other good news is that in the near future there will probably not be any French Upgrades to others nations units - so no FU.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X