Think of it this way. If I happened to be up when Aztec moved this turn and I noticed him online, and realized what was goint to happen, and I quickly logged in, saw the DoW, and buzzed him in-game to say "Hey Buddy! You are getting ready to break rules!" Aztec would say "No-siree Im not!" and I would say "Yeah-huh you are! You have to move after me cause you logged in last on prior turn."
Then we would pause the game for a ruling, and what would happen I ask? Aztec gets the prior turn reloaded to undo his prior login to retroactively give him first move?!? No way... The ruling would be, Aztec you have to wait for Turkey to move before you can DoW. Make a cease fire and wait for Turkey to move, then you can DoW and do your move. Then no reload would even be needed, we would just play from the beginning of the turn. That is exactly what we should do here... play from the beginning of the turn.
Of course Aztec are willing to reload to before they did the second login. They have all the info they need already. They get the benefit of early info/extra planning time from the early log-in. Reloading to before they re-logged in would not change this, AND it would enable them to benefit from it. Aztec logged in after me because they couldnt resist getting the info early, because they realized the value of this info in planning their tactics for next turn.
Now it is too late, Aztecs have had the extra time from last turn plus all of this turn to plan their tactics. That can not be undone. The only fair thing to do is let them keep their early info, but let me get the first move that I am entitled to under the rules.
Another example... If I log in right now and raze Washington, a reload would be given without question if America requested it, simply based on the fact that America hasnt moved and I am supposed to go after them not before. It would not matter one iota for me to say "That city is getting razed anyway, no matter that America moves first." And if I said "OK reload back 2 turns to when the war started so I can move first in the turn and thus have first move", nobody would agree with that. Everyone would agree that the reload should be limited to my illegal move, not to retroactively give me first move. Nobody would even argue this so why the argument now?
As I said, this has been strictly enforced on me in past wars and I whined about it to the other player but then accepted it without asking for a host ruling or a selective reload. I am now just asking we strictly enforcing the same rule.
Then we would pause the game for a ruling, and what would happen I ask? Aztec gets the prior turn reloaded to undo his prior login to retroactively give him first move?!? No way... The ruling would be, Aztec you have to wait for Turkey to move before you can DoW. Make a cease fire and wait for Turkey to move, then you can DoW and do your move. Then no reload would even be needed, we would just play from the beginning of the turn. That is exactly what we should do here... play from the beginning of the turn.
Of course Aztec are willing to reload to before they did the second login. They have all the info they need already. They get the benefit of early info/extra planning time from the early log-in. Reloading to before they re-logged in would not change this, AND it would enable them to benefit from it. Aztec logged in after me because they couldnt resist getting the info early, because they realized the value of this info in planning their tactics for next turn.
Now it is too late, Aztecs have had the extra time from last turn plus all of this turn to plan their tactics. That can not be undone. The only fair thing to do is let them keep their early info, but let me get the first move that I am entitled to under the rules.
Another example... If I log in right now and raze Washington, a reload would be given without question if America requested it, simply based on the fact that America hasnt moved and I am supposed to go after them not before. It would not matter one iota for me to say "That city is getting razed anyway, no matter that America moves first." And if I said "OK reload back 2 turns to when the war started so I can move first in the turn and thus have first move", nobody would agree with that. Everyone would agree that the reload should be limited to my illegal move, not to retroactively give me first move. Nobody would even argue this so why the argument now?
As I said, this has been strictly enforced on me in past wars and I whined about it to the other player but then accepted it without asking for a host ruling or a selective reload. I am now just asking we strictly enforcing the same rule.
Comment