Originally posted by A1CBOZ
And your also right about the longbows....stupid persians
And your also right about the longbows....stupid persians
Here, I can't imagine that the Germans would ever call the Persian horsemen, "Immortals". The name itself would apply at a time when the units were widely feared for their military prowess. But now, they are little more than outdated fighters. All that can be said for them is that they are still very brave and reckless. Perhaps in hand-to-hand combat you might imagine real fear in the eyes of defenders but here, the Immortals charge and barely reach the “walls” before they are cut down in a hail of arrows. If the odds are so much in favour of the defenders, I could imagine them being quite casual about the whole thing.
The other problem that you face in reporting combats is that the whole combat model is too simple in CIV. Let’s be honest, if I have 10 axemen against 3 archers, I’m not going to say to the first group
“Off you go boys and the rest of us will wait here and see how you do!”.
I then see my axemen killed first by arrows and then, after swiping and missing at the archer figures, getting their throats cut by some dagger that the archers carry.
What I WILL do is send all my axemen together and attack the city at several points to stretch the defenders and then work to get into the city. If there is any sort of breakthrough then, as long as sufficient attacks are left, they will all be slaughtered.
It’s even worse when you think that a city can fall just to siege weapons. How are you going to explain that “CHARGE!!!!!”
But that’s the difficulty you face. It’s still a fine job that you are doing trying to add commentary to the story behind the story.
Comment