comparison game for woodan and whom else

[brandonjm8]

In other words, you won't take the time to defend why you look at the map.



Just because it can happen, doesn't mean you didn't add it, or keep resetting until stone was available.
When you use WB, you leave it open for discussion. If you didn't change the map, or look at it, then it would never be an issue. But since you do, it is possible. And that's a fact.

And your whole, I don't see stuff response to looking at the map is questionable at best.
Yep, you have to find all the desert and tundra to change it, and all the ice to remove it, but you don't see anything... I'll leave it to others to make up their own mind on that.

your still a fool, just because things are "open" for discussions in your mind doesnt mean that your right, your making the choice to not listen, your making the choice to believe whatever you want to believe. just because you think someone could've cheated doesnt mean they did, your just assuming they did for your own personal gain so your accusations are justified, none of your accusations are justified for the simple fact you cant prove anything, your using your opinions and possibilities as facts which they are not. you can think of me however you want but if you continue to throw out blind accusations then be prepared to be ridiculed.

[brandonjm8]

Max usable land for who? The AI will build on desert and tundra, so it doesn't change anything for the AI.

since i change ALL TERRAIN EVERYWHERE the AI gets the advantage too whether or not you agree, with my maps AI's get alotta cities and quite powerful especially if you are on a continent with 4 others. but since you wont or cant play my maps you have no exp or knowledge just your baseless opinions and blind accusations. all you want to do is assume i cheat, assume i take snapshots of the map while im changing it, to assume whatever it is that goes through your mind to justify an unjustifiable assumption/accusation. you stating your opinion or what "could" happen does not reflect any facts, you are in fact talking outta yer @$$ hoping to get lucky with one of your accusations/assumptions. since you like to do as such its very easy to see your bias, the only thing on your mind is attacking me. as i already said since you wont or cant play these 2x huge maps you have NO EXP OR KNOWLEDGE for them, thats an undeniable fact .

[Ming]

Your posts don't ridicule me... actually, they are doing exactly the opposite of what you think.

There's a reason why people playing a comparison or competitive game don't use WB... Because it allows for cheating. Whether it happens or not, the opportunity is there, and that's why people don't use it, and lock the assests. If it's a custom map, in most cases, the designer doesn't play, since he has prior knowledge of the map.

It's interesting that you call your peeking at the map a "necessary evil"... other people might call it something else.

[brandonjm8]

You don't have to remember everything, just what's near your starting position. Regardless of the size of your maps the immediate land around your capital is the same size as everyone else. My memory ain't too good these days but I sure can remember where that iron deposit and nearby huts are in the games I do peek into the WB. I would hope your memory isn't worse than mine!

but then your assuming i look for those things, maybe you cant just focus on something and the others are blurred out but i can, its called "concentration". as far as whats near me i have alot of early scouts out anyways on auto scouting the whole area, by the time i get to my 3rd city most if not all of my land is scouted, at least by my cap. if you dont want to believe me thats fine but just because you dont want to believe me doesnt mean your right .

[Ming]

since i change ALL TERRAIN EVERYWHERE the AI gets the advantage too

And what advantage do they get? They would build cities there anyway, meaning MAX EXPANSION FOR THEM.
The human is the one getting the advantage because it means more land for the human, NOT for the AI.

Try again... please explain why this justifies your "necessary evil" of peaking at the map in a comparison game.

[brandonjm8]

Your posts don't ridicule me... actually, they are doing exactly the opposite of what you think.

There's a reason why people playing a comparison or competitive game don't use WB... Because it allows for cheating. Whether it happens or not, the opportunity is there, and that's why people don't use it, and lock the assests. If it's a custom map, in most cases, the designer doesn't play, since he has prior knowledge of the map.

It's interesting that you call your peeking at the map a "necessary evil"... other people might call it something else.

dont you have anything better to do? actually two of my facts are very visible, one you are nothing but a bully with no life, two you are very desperate to speak louder than anyone here, you dont know how to quit when you are behind.

your still attacking me after Robert Plomp told you to stop, are you going to continue to provoke me? you already got your warning, next is the ban.

why wont you go on a thread in which you are actually participating in? you are not playing my maps so therefore you have nothing to contribute here. if you persist on staying here throwing your blind accusations around then i'll continue to ridicule you.

and here we go another round of the "boy ming" broken record player, he must have energizer batteries in that thing .

[brandonjm8]

And what advantage do they get? They would build cities there anyway, meaning MAX EXPANSION FOR THEM.
The human is the one getting the advantage because it means more land for the human, NOT for the AI.

Try again... please explain why this justifies your "necessary evil" of peaking at the map in a comparison game.

nope, get a life "boy ming"

[Ming]

Yep... your only possible response for changing the land is that it helps the player, so I can understand why you really can't answer the quesiton.

Peeking at the map is NOT a necessary evil... it is something that should NOT be done in a comparison game, pure and simple.

[brandonjm8]

Yep... your only possible response for changing the land is that it helps the player, so I can understand why you really can't answer the quesiton.

Peeking at the map is NOT a necessary evil... it is something that should NOT be done in a comparison game, pure and simple.

"boy ming", little kids such as yourself opinions dont have any merit thus not need answering. if you dont like that then do something about it. nobody here has to listen to what you say or what you want answered or otherwise or how you want things.

this isnt burger king "boy ming", you cant have it your way .

[brandonjm8]

i guess even "boy ming" doesnt follow the rules, robert plomp did tell you to stop "boy ming", you refusing to listen is therefore against the rules, keep it up and he may keep his word and ban you.

[Ming]

I will continue to discuss civ issues where ever I want in these forums. And like anybody else, I will state my opinions on civ related issues. If people don't want to listen or read them, that's their right as members of this community. But I will continue posting them. If somebody disagrees with them, they are more than welcome to state their opinons on civ related matters. That's how this community works. Deal with it.

[brandonjm8]

I will continue to discuss civ issues where ever I want in these forums. And like anybody else, I will state my opinions on civ related issues. If people don't want to listen or read them, that's their right as members of this community. But I will continue posting them. If somebody disagrees with them, they are more than welcome to state their opinons on civ related matters. That's how this community works. Deal with it.

then deal with the fact that YOU WILL be banned for instigating and/or provoking me or anyone else, you are in fact refusing to do as what robert plomp told you to do, your making the choice to ignore him and do as you please, you are in fact breaking the rules. do you want me to copy and paste his warning to you and me again for you too see? i will.

raise your hands if you want "boy ming" to get a life:

me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me .

[Ming]

do you want me to copy and paste his warning to you and me again for you too see? i will.

No need to... I will:

Stop the name calling and insulting.
Next time I can only hand out a ban.

(And please also try to not provoce those who easily fall into name calling and insulting.)

I notice there is no mention of a ban on the second part, only the name calling and personal insults stuff.

Have a nice day.

[brandonjm8]

Stop the name calling and insulting.
Next time I can only hand out a ban.

(And please also try to not provoce those who easily fall into name calling and insulting.)
__________________
Formerly known as "CyberShy"
Carpe Diem tamen Memento Mori
Last edited by Robert Plomp; January 25, 2010 at 06:44.

you do notice the "ban" in the sentence right? Next time I can only hand out a BAN.



that applies to you too

[Brael]

One good thing to this thread, it means there's no point in me finishing that comparison game.

What a shame too, I was running a surplus of 800/turn (plus the Kremlin and running US) with 100% to science and outspying everyone.

Hardest game ever.