I am puzzled about AI behaviour. Im Running BTS 3.03 + Solver's CoreDLL and Academy fix.
Im playing Pangea, small, 10 civs (so its crowded), Monarch, Marathon, no Vassals or Random Events.
I am Roman Holly Empire and to my west is Mao.
Mao decided to invade with far superior force. Many Axemen + Swordsmen aganinst my few Axemen and archers.
To my surprise he did not destroy any of my improvements!
I was able to use my copper mine and later horses to raise enough units to counter Mao's better armies and drive him away.
Also I decided to abandon one small city of size 2 in order to save the archers and rushed them to the capital to boost its defense.
Mao did NOT choose to take an EMPTY city!
So to sum up, his behaviour was totally unpredictable. He raised 1 city and took another but left an empty one alone and did not even bother to destroy roads to my copper and horses to prevent me from raising more stronger units in the capital.
This has never been that way in Civ 4 and so I am asking if this is expected with BTS or is it a side-effect of the modified CoreDLL?
Thanx.
Im playing Pangea, small, 10 civs (so its crowded), Monarch, Marathon, no Vassals or Random Events.
I am Roman Holly Empire and to my west is Mao.
Mao decided to invade with far superior force. Many Axemen + Swordsmen aganinst my few Axemen and archers.
To my surprise he did not destroy any of my improvements!
I was able to use my copper mine and later horses to raise enough units to counter Mao's better armies and drive him away.
Also I decided to abandon one small city of size 2 in order to save the archers and rushed them to the capital to boost its defense.
Mao did NOT choose to take an EMPTY city!
So to sum up, his behaviour was totally unpredictable. He raised 1 city and took another but left an empty one alone and did not even bother to destroy roads to my copper and horses to prevent me from raising more stronger units in the capital.
This has never been that way in Civ 4 and so I am asking if this is expected with BTS or is it a side-effect of the modified CoreDLL?
Thanx.
Comment