Zoe also would have been acceptable.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Idea for BtS
Collapse
X
-
It is mostly because they think the Celts aren't important enough to have a second leader when Spain, Japan, and Arabia still have one. I'd complain more about De Gaulle and Lincoln.Originally posted by wodan11
Most of what I've seen are ppl saying she was a loser who staged an unsuccessful rebellion. 'course, they say much the same thing about Gandhi.USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!
The video may avatar is from
Comment
-
I can understand the reservation people might have about a civ having three leaders. Given the choice of the American leaders we now have, I would have had Washington and Lincoln originally. If I was forced to choose three of any American leader, Washington, Lincoln and Jefferson (who was in that poll Firaxis had on their site between the original release and the release of Warlords).Originally posted by Will9
It is mostly because they think the Celts aren't important enough to have a second leader when Spain, Japan, and Arabia still have one. I'd complain more about De Gaulle and Lincoln.
In my opinion, any leader who was in Civ I should have been in the game from the start, but that's just the nostalgia speaking.
Comment
-
Except that it would instantaneously meet the freedom requirement (both civs would be equal size, having exactly one city), and thus it would start the game being not a vassal...Originally posted by Virdrago
If America and England are in together, America should automatically start as an English Vassal...
Oh wait, it's already that way.
Wodan
Comment
-
Don't worry, you didn't offend me at all. If anything, I think that I alienated our lovable Australian friends here.Originally posted by Virdrago
Wodan:
You're the first to notice that. I wondered how much pot-stirring would go on before it would come up...
Sorry if I offended anyone... (Croup)
But seriously, I couldn't pass that up.
Comment
-
You offended meOriginally posted by Virdrago
Wodan:
You're the first to notice that. I wondered how much pot-stirring would go on before it would come up...
Sorry if I offended anyone... (Croup)
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Comment
-
LS is offended. Why, exactly? I liked the free jails for Australia comment. Of course, I'm not Australian.
No matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
"I played it [Civilization] for three months and then realised I hadn't done any work. In the end, I had to delete all the saved files and smash the CD." Iain Banks, author
Comment
-
Why?
History of Australia
Imagine how the poor French must be feeling because of constant American bashing concerning WW2.I'm not buying BtS until Firaxis impliments the "contiguous cultural border negates colony tax" concept.
Comment
-
Don't tell me the history of Australia. I know it.Originally posted by _BuRjaCi_
Why?
History of Australia
Imagine how the poor French must be feeling because of constant American bashing concerning WW2.
Fact about Australia: any Aussie with convict heritage is very proud of it. I am very proud of my convict heritage.
I don't make jokes/insulting remarks about other's heritage, so why should I have to put up with it?
Do I make fun of Americans because they are rebels? Or anyone in Europe that they're land-stealing, native killing colonisers?
No, so do me the same respect!
Comment
-
Well, they were kind of envius untill WWI.Originally posted by Dale
Or anyone in Europe that they're land-stealing, native killing colonisers?
I'm not buying BtS until Firaxis impliments the "contiguous cultural border negates colony tax" concept.
Comment
-
Proud of a convict heritage? Guess it depends on the crime they commited, but I know I'm not proud of how the US treated Native Americans. Here's the thing though, that's in a past so far gone that no one from that time is alive today, so if anyone comments on it as a slur against the U.S. today, it doesn't bother me and I just think the person is an idiot. I would think the same would go for any country with a shady history.EViiiiiiL!!! - Mermaid Man
Comment
Comment