I touched on this in the HRE thread, but I figured it deserved it's own separate discussion.
Does everyone else agree that this will be the last XP? They probably could have stretched things out for another XP if they didn't include so many new civs in this one.
There really isn't enough quality civs left to justify a third XP at this point. There is Siam, Hebrews, Poland, Polynesia, maybe someone like the Hittites or Assyrians, maybe a modern nation like Australia, but that's it, and I would consider those to be definite third string civs. There are still a lot of leaders for existing civs like the always mentioned Spain/Japan/Arabs. But with all the new units, techs and so on, I think they have pretty much shot their load on what could possibly be added at this point unless they go for something that totally expands the scope of the game, like a new "future" age beyond the modern age.
Are we all pretty much in agreement on this?
Does everyone else agree that this will be the last XP? They probably could have stretched things out for another XP if they didn't include so many new civs in this one.
There really isn't enough quality civs left to justify a third XP at this point. There is Siam, Hebrews, Poland, Polynesia, maybe someone like the Hittites or Assyrians, maybe a modern nation like Australia, but that's it, and I would consider those to be definite third string civs. There are still a lot of leaders for existing civs like the always mentioned Spain/Japan/Arabs. But with all the new units, techs and so on, I think they have pretty much shot their load on what could possibly be added at this point unless they go for something that totally expands the scope of the game, like a new "future" age beyond the modern age.
Are we all pretty much in agreement on this?
Comment