My goal is to ask and learn.I got this idea from 2 sources:I replayed Vel'workshop 1a.,but here were the barbarians,not the americans,who founded a city near Rome;this changed the game,giving me a great advantage,because I conquered the city and that only location became the point of all my defensive and offensive needs.2nd source:I like to replay games trying other strategies.
I noticed that the great differences came,not from the computer'civilizations,but from the barbarian behaviour.
So,do masters try to use the barbarians,such as allowing barbarian to foundcities and conquer them,saving settlers and war declarations,and acting as buffers,or is it better to destroy them on sight,and...?
I would like to ear the word of the masters.
Best regards,
I noticed that the great differences came,not from the computer'civilizations,but from the barbarian behaviour.
So,do masters try to use the barbarians,such as allowing barbarian to foundcities and conquer them,saving settlers and war declarations,and acting as buffers,or is it better to destroy them on sight,and...?
I would like to ear the word of the masters.
Best regards,

Comment