The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
1- AI has ridiculous advantages and definitely cheats
2- attacking a city without catapults is a
I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.
Maybe this Cavalry unit imployed tactics, (unseen to the strategic commander) and had a small group of cavalrymen demonstrate in front of the gunners and had the rest of the group flank the guns, and by the time they had the guns turned all the way around, they were dead.
I don't know what I've been told!
Deirdre's got a Network Node!
Love to press the Buster Switch!
Gonna nuke that crazy witch!
Why? Initial gunpowder infantry units were *weaker* than their non-gunpowder equivalents. Their utility came from the fact that it was easier and cheaper to train a musketman than a longbowman - but in a fair fight with equal numbers, the longbowmen would've wiped the floor with the musketmen. If you really want to "fix" the gunpowder units, make them cheaper.
Not true, the spanish only sent like 250 gunpowder units into the new world, and conquried millions of archer natives. Its easyer to shoot a gun then it is to shoot an arrow, and gunpowder is much stronger.
Your right to say that and your point is less factual, but early gunpowder units actually had a great disadvantage against archers: for one the original guns would break under unfavorable conditions, and two the archers could fire a ton of arrows in the time it took a gunman to reload his musket. Just had to point that out.
Siga El Conejo Blanco Dios, patria y libertad - Ecuadorian motto
| NationStates Roleplayer: The Honor Guard | Check out my Civ4 'friendly game' of MP: A Few Good Leaders |
Your right to say that and your point is less factual, but early gunpowder units actually had a great disadvantage against archers: for one the original guns would break under unfavorable conditions, and two the archers could fire a ton of arrows in the time it took a gunman to reload his musket. Just had to point that out.
which was balanced by the extreme ease of recruiting musketeers vs recruiting archers. Training a longbowmen requires a lifetime of practice.
Training a musketman requires about half an hour. Training a good one might take longer, but mostly its getting them to do as they're told and not run away. Firing the gun? No sweat.
Personally, I think there should be very low cost of upgrades to get units from ancient/medieval to musketeers. Or at least make them a cheap unit.
By working faithfully eight hours a day, you may get to be a boss and work twelve hours a day.
Originally posted by Kc7mxo
Personally, I think there should be very low cost of upgrades to get units from ancient/medieval to musketeers. Or at least make them a cheap unit.
You may cause other game balancing problems with that.
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Not true, the spanish only sent like 250 gunpowder units into the new world, and conquried millions of archer natives. Its easyer to shoot a gun then it is to shoot an arrow, and gunpowder is much stronger.
thats not the point either. on paper, a skilled archer is a much better asset than a guy with a musket. in real life, the skilled archers thought that these people were gods and the racket from the boomsticks scared the sh!# outta them. not to mention stone arrows were worthless against an iron curiass.
Why is it stupid? Cavalry were what was used to overrun machine guns during the War Between the States. No major power phased cavalry out until the 40s - and before you make any Poland jokes, the two countries with the highest percentage of cavalry in 1939 were Germany and the US.
What machine gun did they have in the US Civil War? The infantry on both sides used single shot rifles, if the troops were lucky, they had breach loading weapons and not the muzzle loaders.
What machine gun did they have in the US Civil War? The infantry on both sides used single shot rifles, if the troops were lucky, they had breach loading weapons and not the muzzle loaders.
civilwarhome.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, civilwarhome.com has it all. We hope you find what you are searching for!
Siga El Conejo Blanco Dios, patria y libertad - Ecuadorian motto
| NationStates Roleplayer: The Honor Guard | Check out my Civ4 'friendly game' of MP: A Few Good Leaders |
Not true, the spanish only sent like 250 gunpowder units into the new world, and conquried millions of archer natives. Its easyer to shoot a gun then it is to shoot an arrow, and gunpowder is much stronger.
They also brought things like smallpox, flu and various other diseases which the local population had no immunity to.
They also brought things like smallpox, flu and various other diseases which the local population had no immunity to.
Excellent point! Sheesh... why didnt I remember that...
Siga El Conejo Blanco Dios, patria y libertad - Ecuadorian motto
| NationStates Roleplayer: The Honor Guard | Check out my Civ4 'friendly game' of MP: A Few Good Leaders |
Comment