Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Leaders Firaxis considered but didn't include (from art files)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by LordShiva


    This is stupid. You can pretty much make this argument against any religious belief ("Oh, it's ok to slip pork into a Jewish or Muslim person's food, because the idea that a thinking person in the 21st century would believe that pork is contaminated by the devil would be offensive" or "Oh, abortion is alright, because a foetus is really only a bunch of non-sentient cells" or "Oh, nevermind that religion X forbids its adherents to do Y because I think that's just silly").
    I can (and do) aver that anyone living their lives according to some code based on nothing more than tradition and faith is wrong-headed (at least, it would be, if it weren't hilarious).

    I have never said that I would force anyone to do anything. Did you actually read my posts?


    The simple fact is, it IS offensive (and taking offense is not, as you seem to imply, a reaction under one's conscious control). There's NOTHING to be gained for you or me (I happen to be a militant atheist) from offending people in such a fashion. End of debate.
    Indeed, I said that I UNDERSTOOD and RESPECTED the marketing decision made here. What I do not respect are the substantive beliefs themselves. Islam is a fallacy, just like the rest of the religions. I will not force Muslims to give up their beliefs (however much they may desire to force me to give up mine,) but I do not need to accord respect. Tolerance, perhaps, but not respect.

    And if you believe the mere posting of a picture of Muhammad is offensive, perhaps you are not as athiest as you pretend?
    Last edited by jkp1187; November 3, 2005, 09:44.
    "The nation that controls magnesium controls the universe."

    -Matt Groenig

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by duodecimal


      Aye, curious that those are out but Mao is in, and he was the worst of the lot. He's still revered in China, and he didn't kill many westerners, so even though he's probably the bloodiest murderer in the history of Mankind, it's not objectionable to most that he's in.

      As for the rest, mostly dirtbags. Roosevelt is no hero of mine, even though that dictator managed to get on most historians' good side ... if Lincoln was in I'd make it a point to wipe him out.
      All the more reason to includ Muhammad. He was, after all, just a man, and an effective politician/military leader. Like you said, almost every leader in the game has blood on his hands (however just his cause may have been).

      Anyway, does anyone have pictures that they could post here? And where are they located in the files, again???
      "The nation that controls magnesium controls the universe."

      -Matt Groenig

      Comment


      • #78
        This thread is ripe for a lock... it has less and less to do with CIV as each post is made.
        Friedrich Psitalon
        Admin, Civ4Players Ladder
        Consultant, Firaxis Games

        Comment


        • #79
          Before it's locked, can someone please tell me what directory/file this pictures are located in? I actually have an interest in adding civs/leaders to the game, believe it or not.
          "The nation that controls magnesium controls the universe."

          -Matt Groenig

          Comment


          • #80
            The pictures in question ar 16x16 pixels - hardly much good for an actual in-game image.

            Agreed about thread locking - this has gone strongly off-topic.
            Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
            Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
            I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

            Comment

            Working...
            X