Originally posted by LordShiva
This is stupid. You can pretty much make this argument against any religious belief ("Oh, it's ok to slip pork into a Jewish or Muslim person's food, because the idea that a thinking person in the 21st century would believe that pork is contaminated by the devil would be offensive" or "Oh, abortion is alright, because a foetus is really only a bunch of non-sentient cells" or "Oh, nevermind that religion X forbids its adherents to do Y because I think that's just silly").
This is stupid. You can pretty much make this argument against any religious belief ("Oh, it's ok to slip pork into a Jewish or Muslim person's food, because the idea that a thinking person in the 21st century would believe that pork is contaminated by the devil would be offensive" or "Oh, abortion is alright, because a foetus is really only a bunch of non-sentient cells" or "Oh, nevermind that religion X forbids its adherents to do Y because I think that's just silly").
I have never said that I would force anyone to do anything. Did you actually read my posts?
The simple fact is, it IS offensive (and taking offense is not, as you seem to imply, a reaction under one's conscious control). There's NOTHING to be gained for you or me (I happen to be a militant atheist) from offending people in such a fashion. End of debate.
And if you believe the mere posting of a picture of Muhammad is offensive, perhaps you are not as athiest as you pretend?
Comment