My first Civ game was CtP, so I never got the habit of calling production sheilds.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hammers are Stupid, Throw Shields at Them
Collapse
X
-
I prefer Hammers to Shields...
But give me back my "Militia"!!THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Comment
-
Having been a faithful player of Civilization since the early days of Civ for DOS, I have to agree that hammers just aren't the same as shields.
Oh sure, I understand that hammers make much more logical sense than shields do, but as people have already pointed out, shields and Civ are as intertwined as peanut butter and jelly.
Oh well, I'm sure that someone will release a hammer/shield mod soon, and I'll be downloading it soon enough.The Electronic Hobbit
Comment
-
Shields rock.
Just like the town council movies did.-------------------------------><------------------------------
History should be known for learning from the past...
Nah... it only shows stupidity of mankind.
-------------------------------><------------------------------
Comment
-
Originally posted by Verenti
Shields made NO sense, but damnit, they're OURS.
Anyone can come up with Hammers, but Shields was truely thinking outside the box. It's called abstract creative thought, and I LOVE it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Martinus
Yeah, hammers make no sense. Everybody knows you build buildings using shields, not hammers.
Comment
-
Hammers seems like a logical change, but those are clearly mallets, not hammers. What is more, the handle is facing the wrong way. Outrageous!To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
H.Poincaré
Comment
Comment