RTCiv

[LordShiva]

Originally posted by Sava
civ FPS?

now THAT would be awesome

[Drakan]

Whaaaaaaaaaat was that Sava ???

[Sava]

sid meier's counter-strike civilization

[Solver]

That's a good one .

And it looks like you've been playing too much BF2 and CS lately, Sava .

[FrostyBoy]

Originally posted by LordShiva

Great RTS games aren't made by first writing a TBS game and then modding it.

We don't know that yet

[Senethro]

Haha, that looks a great photoshop you pulled that from Sava. Care to link?

[Sava]

Originally posted by Senethro
Haha, that looks a great photoshop you pulled that from Sava. Care to link?

It's from www.somethingawful.com (website is in photo)

it was from one of their "photoshop friday" competitions... I believe it came from the theme "video game mix ups" or something of that sort.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Maniac
Wars, and in general all unit movement, would be better in a Paradox-like system.

That's what simultaneous turn is for.

Originally posted by Maniac
It's really silly that moving a unit a few tiles supposedly takes a whole year, and that you can build a cathedral in the turns it would need to move from Paris to Moscow in a Napoleon scenario, to give a couple examples.

That has more to do with the inconsistencies - required to balance the game - of Civ itself than anything else. You won't fix it by making the game "continuous flow."