Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Confucianism??

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    A fine distinction, and the connotation is usually negative.
    "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
    "Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
    2004 Presidential Candidate
    2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by TechWins


      Atheism is the lack thereof belief in a higher power, diety, god, or gods. Atheism does not necessarily mean no religious belief, to clear things up; it's just that atheism typically brings with it a further connotation.
      That "religion" might be fof the anti-religion Soviets or something.
      The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
      "God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
      "We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
      The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report

      Comment


      • #18
        Yeah, Secularism (just a better thing to call it, since it implies a certain social view of religion in addition to describing the literal religious beliefs of someone) has to be in.

        Comment


        • #19
          @ alex: good point

          the declaration by marx that "there is no god" which was adopted by the soviet state is of course a theological assertion. in other words, yes, there are valid reasons for considering communism as a religion

          Originally posted by Vince278
          I thought atheism was basically nothing-ism.
          now let's not get confused with nihilism - really more of a philosophy than a religion. nihilism is the belief that all values are baseless and that nothing can be known or communicated. basically, it denies the possibility of any kind of purpose or existence.

          atheism is (arguably) less ambitious in that it only denies the existence of god. some interpretations of buddhism and taoism are quite atheist. they do not deny the possibility of meaning, order, form, knowledge or communication. you can be a perfectly good buddhist/taoist and firmly believe there is no god.

          Originally posted by Ambro2000 Confucianism in China is undoubtly the most important “religious/philosophical†alignment thru out history.
          and just to clear things up, my own (limited)understanding of confucianism is that confucianism is neither a religion, nor a philosophy. as i understand it, it is basically just a collection of more or less arbitrary platitudes and proverbs. there is some implied sense of a 'cosmic order,' but even the basic cosmology is very much a matter of individual interpretation.

          i'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but at this stage, i see it more as a random collection of ghost stories and 'calendar quotes'
          I don't know what I am - Pekka

          Comment


          • #20
            @ kuci

            sorry, mate, secularism is not 'a better thing to call it.'

            firstly, secularism is not (in my opinion) a well defined term. different people use it to mean many different things.

            secondly, in terms of government, secularism often refers to the separation of church and state. clearly, a state enforced system of atheism as implemented by the soviets is not a separation, but an identification of church and state. if anything, the soviet system is one of the least secular systems in recent history

            finally, depending on who is using the term and how much they have had to drink at the time, secularism is not a form of atheism. it is sometimes used to suggest that man is better off pursuing his own improvement, rather than relying on a divine being. it does not necessarily reject the existence of god. it's kind of an official name for those who choose not to be 'god-botherers.'
            I don't know what I am - Pekka

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Alexander01


              That "religion" might be fof the anti-religion Soviets or something.
              From my understanding, pure Marxist idelogy is not entirely opposed to religion at the personal level but mostly due to it's use as a means to controlling the masses -- an opiate per se. Plus wasn't religion still practiced during the time of Soviet Russia?
              However, it is difficult to believe that 2 times 2 does not equal 4; does that make it true? On the other hand, is it really so difficult simply to accept everything that one has been brought up on and that has gradually struck deep roots – what is considered truth in the circle of moreover, really comforts and elevates man? Is that more difficult than to strike new paths, fighting the habitual, experiencing the insecurity of independence and the frequent wavering of one’s feelings and even one’s conscience, proceeding often without any consolation, but ever with the eternal goal of the true, the beautiful, and the good? - F.N.

              Comment


              • #22
                Yes, but they were officially atheist.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by TechWins


                  Isn't that what atheism is?
                  Most misinformed statement - ever!

                  http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.php?title=Home
                  http://totalfear.blogspot.com/

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by TechWins


                    From my understanding, pure Marxist idelogy is not entirely opposed to religion at the personal level but mostly due to it's use as a means to controlling the masses -- an opiate per se. Plus wasn't religion still practiced during the time of Soviet Russia?
                    As far as I know, Stalin allowed the limited return of
                    orthodox christianity to keep the people loyal during WW2...
                    http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.php?title=Home
                    http://totalfear.blogspot.com/

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      France is a secular state (at the moment, they have quarrels with their Muslim citizens because the French state f.e. doesn't allow scarfs for female pupils/students in schools), but certainly not atheist. Most French have a religion (how religious they're, is another question). So Secularism != Atheism.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Vince278
                        I thought atheism was basically nothing-ism.
                        That might be one interpretation of nihilism, but it isn't a description of atheism,

                        Just because I'm an atheist doesn't mean I believe in nothing.
                        Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                        ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Just because I'm an atheist doesn't mean I believe in nothing.


                          But it means that you believe in no divine power.
                          Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
                          Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
                          I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Solver
                            Just because I'm an atheist doesn't mean I believe in nothing.


                            But it means that you believe in no divine power.

                            Which still isn't nothing.
                            Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                            ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Yes, but that's somewhat disingenuous since you don't believe in anything religious (except perhaps the absense of a divine power).

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Indeed - You are either a true atheist or semi-believer.

                                For such an in-between, the term is called 'agnostic' I believe...

                                ....
                                http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.php?title=Home
                                http://totalfear.blogspot.com/

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X