There has been some speculation that the Arabs, Aztecs, Incans or Babylonians may be dropped from Civ4. If that is the case, which Civ should take its place?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Missing Civ
Collapse
X
-
The Missing Civ
150Greeks60.00%90Mayans4.00%6Assyrians3.33%5Celts7.33%11Koreans2.67%4Vikings12.00%18Zulus (For Die Hard Conventional Civ-ers)10.67%16The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
"God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
"We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action ReportTags: None
-
I would be displeased to lose the Aztecs...always enjoyed them and their wacky city names
I think the Greeks should definitely be in there...seems silly to drop them with their sheer historical significance...Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
Comment
-
It must be connected to growing expectations, but why are there less Civs in a new release of the franchise.
Oh that's right, they have to leave some room to build and collect revenue off of the expansion packs.
I voted Assyrians for absolutely no good reason other than I read recently that they attached metal blades to the chariot wheels. For an extra impact against the foot soldier.Haven't been here for ages....
Comment
-
Well, it looks like public sentiment is currently favoring Greece...The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
"God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
"We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report
Comment
-
-
Greeks as well, but not at the expense of the Babylons.
Comment
Comment