Bombardment

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by Dr Zoidberg


Like in "no separate bombardment units"?

Yes. The thought of a catapult having any use in a field campaign is beyond me. Just make artillery units give either a field or siege bonus (or both) to a formation. Later, make planes independant units that can target infrastructure. Just my two cents.

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by Oncle Boris


We get your point, but infantry entrenched in ruins can be quite lethal.

indeed but I think these are two seperate and equally important issues

just as strafing or dropping a "Carpet bombing" campaign from above has its place and effective implementation, indeed Oncle Boris Infantry are a vital and necessary element of a combined attack


great points all

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by Oncle Boris


Yes. The thought of a catapult having any use in a field campaign is beyond me. Just make artillery units give either a field or siege bonus (or both) to a formation. Later, make planes independant units that can target infrastructure. Just my two cents.

I agree

SIEGE equipment are one thing as in to lay "siege" to something

Artillery would be a more modern effective attack where as you could do more damage from afar

Planes should have abilities independant from either Seige or Artillery!


good valid points

[Zoid]

Originally posted by Oncle Boris


Yes. The thought of a catapult having any use in a field campaign is beyond me. Just make artillery units give either a field or siege bonus (or both) to a formation. Later, make planes independant units that can target infrastructure. Just my two cents.

Well, I suppose that could work