Originally posted by Unimatrix11 b) C4C is just a remake of Col.
One is that they replaced the original leaders leading each nation - and some of the new ones were even founding fathers in the original. And thus we have to conclude there have been changes to the way the founding father system works also.
Another is that the whole aspect of writing a Constitution once you declare independence - where you among other can choose to write in Slavery (going to assume this will have some kind of civic-like effect) - is an entirely new feature.
I think it is safe to say that C4C is NOT 'just a remake of Col' and thus it can't really be used as a reason for not including Portugal.
Furtermore considering the Slavery aspect of the Constitution it sounds very dubios that they didn't include Portugal due their heavy use of slaves in the New World.
The US centric reason is actually the only one that still fits - and yet it doesn't makes sense if they aren't going to be very accurate about other historical aspects anyway.
Comment