Tweet
75% agrees with me. The other 37.5% does not.
-
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts. -
No, she was acting emotionally. As you pointed out earlier (when conflating the hypothetical for what happened), she didn't use the logic I was expressing. You're just contradicting yourself now.Comment
-
You lost me. More loopy logic.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.Comment
-
Can I get some context here?If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
-
Just vote what I voted.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.Comment
-
Yes you can. You can say "we are not in a relationship right now, but if you want to be in a relationship in the future you won't have sex with someone else".Originally posted by Colon™ View Post
In fact, that seems a pretty obvious requirement of a perspective partner to me.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.Comment
-
Friends is on several times a day, shouldn't take mere than a week to get to the appropriate episode.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
ACK!
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!Comment
-
THEY WERE ON A BREAK
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)Comment
-
What made that situation comic gold was the fact that everyone knew that if Rachel had been the one cheating, there would be nothing Ross could say or do. He would have had to live with it.
Rachel clearly never imagined that Ross would cheat -- because for a person like Ross, the odds of getting the opportunity to cheat are assumed to be reliably remote.Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-ArmsComment
-
He didn't cheat though, as they weren't together at the time.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.Comment
-
I think he's just using that term as a concession in the discussion, not because he believed it was cheating.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)Comment
-
Nuh-uh, don't call it cheating if it wasn't cheating.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.Comment
-
Were Melman and Rachel a couple? No.
That settles it.Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"Comment
-
Discussion of one of the most popular television shows of all time.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostClick here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La RochefoucauldComment
-
By "cheat," I meant "have sex with a woman other than Rachel."Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostApolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-ArmsComment
Comment