Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Military Model III

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Proposal for turn timeslicing system (ticks)

    I have here first shot at a timeslicing system. Rather than refine it further, I thought I would present it and see what people think. Although I intentionally kept it somewhat simplistic, it may already be too complicated. That's one thing I would like People's input on. The thing I am really concerned about with this one is that the player won't always know whether they can move a TF to a particular square on a given turn without a substantial amount of calculation. One option of course is to just have the player try it and see if the move bounces, but that seems too cavalier. Anyway...

    This system is designed so you can tell which TF does what, when and where. The result should be a rough mimicking of what would happen in actual continuous movements system, without much of the overhead involved. The basic idea is that each turn is divided into 10 ticks. Each action that a task force might undertake will have a cost in ticks, and when that cost is paid the unit will complete the action. This regimentation makes it possible to determine when reserves reach an area where combat is going to, or is likely to occur. I'll try and provide a quick example at the bottom. Note that it will occasionally be possible for experienced/hardened units to "break the rules" and squeeze in a few extra ticks per turn when the situation is sufficiently desperate.

    Some of the more extreme actions take more than a turn worth of ticks. It's my intention that if orders are given, and not changed, then ticks can be saved up to achieve an action. This is true for even actions with much lower tick costs if they were "cut off" by the turn boundary. We will see how this works in practice. Additionally we need some mechanism to make sure TFs that happen to complete their movement actions on the same tick can't 'teleport' thru each other without ever covering the intervening space. This will be relatively easy to put in, we just need to decide on some specifics for implementations.

    Mostly what I have so far relates to movement, although there is some other stuff. I think the system I have may already be too complicated, so ideas on how to simplify it with out losing the big effects are very welcome. All the tick costs below are additive. You just take all the relevant modifiers that apply and some them together. For each area I will list either the based tick costs or modifier, followed by a description that will hopefully clue you and is to what I'm talking about .

    Basic terrain types
    4 Flat (Grassland, steppe, flat desert)
    6 Hills/Broken
    10 Mountainous

    - 1 Dirt Road
    - 2 Hard Road (perhaps this bonus should only be for motorized vehicles)
    + 2 Obstructed Movement (Swamp, Jungle, Forest)
    - 1 Any Type of Road through Obstructed Terrain Gives This Additional Bonus
    + 1 Cautious Advance (digging in every night, careful to always have scouts well in advance...)
    +1 to +3 Artillery or other very slow movement item in TF
    +1 to +4 Foraging for food (depending upon availability)
    +1 to +4 Construct field fortifications (diminishing returns with more time spent)
    +1 to +3 Flight Battle (normally on the low end of this)
    +1 to +3 Pillage (depending on how much there is to wreck, somewhat diminishing returns)
    +1 to Forever... Besiege

    I will rely on the military guys to better specify especially the numbers that are given as ranges of tick costs.

    All these modifiers assume movement across a square side. (At least the ones that are movement-oriented) for a diagonal move the tick cost is obtained by multiplying by 3/2 and rounding down.

    Simple Examples
    movement over flat land (4) with a dirt road (-1) with prepositioned supplies (+ 0) -- costs 3 ticks
    movement in hilly (6), forested terrain (+ 2) while foraging (say + 2) -- costs 10 ticks

    Example:

    An ancient invasion. I can't come up with reasonable specifics right now because I'm under time pressure and want to post this, so I will just give a bland example for now. Let's say that a force from Carthage has invaded Roman territory. The Carthaginians, being low on food, and thinking there is no Roman army nearby, split up in order to forage more effectively. The two armies are in adjacent squares. The Roman army has been lucky enough to find out about this, and is going to attempt to attack the forces while they are divided. Let's say the Carthaginians have split evenly into the two forces, and that the Roman forces are equal in combat strength to the combined Carthaginians forces. Let's assume everything happens on Grassland with no roads and that the Romans have prepositioned supplies. We begin with the Carthaginians having split off, but having not yet forage for food. The Romans are in a square directly to the south of one of the Carthaginians TFs (on the right). We start the turn there.

    Tick 1
    both Carthaginians groups began to forage, they will be done at the end of tick 2
    the Romans begin their movement into the Carthaginians square to the right, they will get there on tick 4
    tick 2
    both Carthaginians groups finish foraging, they are now set for food until the end of the turn.
    Tick 3
    Carthaginian group on the left begins moving into square on the right to reunite the armies, this takes 4 ticks, so they will arrive at the end of tick 6 (at this point they don't know the Romans are there) Carthaginian group to the right continues to forage waiting for the other group to return.
    tick 4
    Romans arrive in Carthaginian right square at the end of tick 4.
    Tick 5
    Square on Right Goes into Battle Mode. I think it's fair to say under these circumstances that the Romans will attempt to engage, and that the Carthaginians will attempt to delay or even withdraw in the direction of their compatriots. But the interesting point about the tick system here, is that if the battle were actually fought, we would know when the reserves would be showing up...
    however, this isn't the battle module, so I'm not going to worry about what actually happens in the battle. All the tick system knows is that certain parts of the battle will take a certain length of ticks.
    tick 6
    at the end of tick 6 carthaginian 'left' shows up. This is either in the nick of time, or too late, depending how things have gone in the battle.

    One other point... had the Carthaginian left square force been involved in some longer activity, it would have received word that a battle was imminent only when the Carthaginian right square forces detected the Roman's presence. The AI would then have to decide whether its mission were sufficiently important to go ahead, or whether its mission should be interrupted so it could attempt to support the Carthaginian right. In any case, I think we can assume that notification on an impending battle occurs on the tick after the discovery of enemy forces. That's because the messengers can move much faster than armies can, but without modern communications it would still take some time. For modern times with good communications, the notification would be instantaneous.

    [This message has been edited by Mark_Everson (edited March 01, 2000).]
    Project Lead for The Clash of Civilizations
    A Unique civ-like game that will feature low micromanagement, great AI, and a Detailed Government model including internal power struggles. Demo 8 available Now! (go to D8 thread at top of forum).
    Check it out at the Clash Web Site and Forum right here at Apolyton!

    Comment


    • #62
      Although I usuaally read the posts here I leave the comments alone. However today I have some things on your way of handling ticks to propose.

      -----
      This system is designed so you can tell which TF does what, when and where. The result should be a rough mimicking of what would happen in actual continuous movements system, without much of the overhead involved. The basic idea is that each turn is divided into 10 ticks. Each action that a task force might undertake will have a cost in ticks, and went back cost is paid the unit will complete the action. This regimentation makes it possible to determine when reserves reach an area where combat Hans, or is likely to occur. I'll try and provide a quick example at the bottom. Note that it will occasionally be possible for experienced/hardened units to "break the rules" and squeeze in a few extra ticks per turn when so ordered. Some of the more extreme actions take more than a turn worth of ticks. It's my intention that if orders are given, and not changed, then ticks can be saved up to achieve an action. This is true for even actions with much lower tick costs if they were "cutoff" by the turn boundary. We will see how this works in practice.
      -----
      Ticks I'm assuming represent time from all the discussions so therefore you shouldn't be able to save up an infinitate amount of ticks, and in fact, not too many at all. Probably 5 is the most. Another thing is that you should also do is have a 2:1 coversion ratio so that 2 unused ticks will convert only to 1 unused tick.

      -----
      Basic terrain types
      4 Flat (Grassland, steppe, flat desert)
      6 Hills/Broken
      10 Mountainous

      - 1 Dirt Road
      - 2 Hard Road
      + 2 Obstructed Movement (Swamp, Jungle, Forest)
      - 1 Any Type of Road through Obstructed Terrain Gives This Additional Bonus
      + 1 Cautious Advance (digging in every night, careful to always have scouts well in advance...)
      +1 to +3 Artillery or other very slow movement item in TF
      +1 to +4 Foraging for food (depending upon availability)
      +1 to +4 Construct field fortifications (diminishing returns with more time spent)
      +1 to +3 Flight Battle (normally on the low end of this)
      +1 to +3 Pillage (depending on how much there is to wreck, somewhat diminishing returns)
      +1 to Forever... Besiege
      -----
      You should also have something for forced marches or something to increase speed (less ticks) if ur also using the opposite (cautious approach).
      Which Love Hina Girl Are You?
      Mitsumi Otohime
      Oh dear! Are you even sure you answered the questions correctly?) Underneath your confused exterior, you hold fast to your certainties and seek to find the truth about the things you don't know. While you may not be brimming with confidence and energy, you are content with who you are and accepting of both your faults and the faults of others. But while those around you love you deep down, they may find your nonchalance somewhat infuriating. Try to put a bit more thought into what you are doing, and be more aware of your surroundings.

      Comment


      • #63
        Mark:

        The tic system sounds good, though I am not clear on how long a turn is but I suppose it isn't too important.

        A few things here. Way the unit sytem is set up we do have actual movment rates for the TF based on the slowest unit (artillery for ex.) this could probably be converted directly to a tic modifier for the said TF.

        Second, the battle module is currently set up without defining how long it actually takes due to the semi-random nature of the system, if a general gets lucky he could move through the phases with relative ease, if not it could take many phases. What we could do is determine a conversion factor of total number of phases used and what that would be in tics.

        Also FYI the big hurdle has been crossed, I mainled Kerenske the assult phase model (which is pretty big) a few days ago, hopefully he will get back to me with his thoughts on the formulas et al. And it can be posted on his site. Also I will be mailing him the last phase (withdrawl) in a day or two. So hopefully it can all be up within the next week.

        -Harli

        Comment


        • #64
          Harli:

          A military turn is Always 1 mo. Remember the long agonizing discussion? That makes a tick always three days...

          Glad to hear the assault model is on the way. The tech guys need to hear from you or Krenske soon too.
          Project Lead for The Clash of Civilizations
          A Unique civ-like game that will feature low micromanagement, great AI, and a Detailed Government model including internal power struggles. Demo 8 available Now! (go to D8 thread at top of forum).
          Check it out at the Clash Web Site and Forum right here at Apolyton!

          Comment


          • #65
            Hi everyone,

            Yes I did receive your Email, Harli, Guess what I only opened it today! Why ? I just spent 4 days in bed recovering from an alergic reaction to some immunisation shots that I needed for an upcoming trip to africa. I will try to get the pages put together and posted somepoint today or tomorrow.

            Yours

            Paul Krenske

            Comment


            • #66
              Ouch... hope you're feeling better.
              Project Lead for The Clash of Civilizations
              A Unique civ-like game that will feature low micromanagement, great AI, and a Detailed Government model including internal power struggles. Demo 8 available Now! (go to D8 thread at top of forum).
              Check it out at the Clash Web Site and Forum right here at Apolyton!

              Comment


              • #67
                Some thoughts on ticks,

                A special moral case could provide a slight benefit to the movement, especially when moving over a short area. Maybe we could give the player a "free" forced march when, say, your going towards your final assault on the capital city after 5 years of war. Or the Carthage army troops could be motivated to save their comrades and move very fast without complaining about how their tired.
                Or even a huge win could ad just a little spring in the unit's step.

                I think the idea on forced marches should be a little bit more complex though, here are some different speeds:

                comfortable (+2) This would be useful for a army that has just had an extreme amount of action and is not presently needed but has to be moved. This would allow them to move slower and rest longer, this would boost overall troop Moral (as long as they aren't doing this while there's a major battle that they should be at) and increase their health (I don't think there is a link between the disease model and the mil model, there should be though just look at W.W.I and the Flu). This might not be needed, thoughts?

                Cautious advance (+1 or +2) obvious, but there could be different amounts, for example you could send you troops and set them for +2 when you know almost for certain they will be attacked yet you don't know where and your own scouting abilities are lacking, this would allow your force to respond very quickly, but doing this for prolonged amounts of time may lower moral as troops become frustrated always being on the highest alert.

                Regular (+0) obvious

                Accelerated (-1) less sleep, a little quicker pace, minor moral change unless overdone, lower readiness and lower scouting ability,

                High acceleration (-2) when in crisis, only really feasible if going a place for a reason, very bad for moral when used for long amounts of time, disease can be spread for long amounts of time, extremely susceptible to ambushes and some types of guerilla warfare, easy to pick up, lower combat effectiveness when attacking directly after the march

                Extreme acceleration (-3) absolute sprint, absolutely impossible for more then a certain amount of time, everything that happens with high execration only doubled, only possible when troops have some kind of reason (or are extremely loyal)

                all these systems are towards, obviously a tank wouldn't have the same kind of reactions but we can do those vehicles later. We remember we want the player to use regular most of the time! We can also add in things like mechanical malfunctions when troops are pushed too hard (e.g. M-16s not being properly cleaned in Vietnam)

                Comment


                • #68
                  Logo:

                  I have two problems with your proposal. The first is a detail... with your proposed modifications we could end up with movement that takes zero ticks. That would be just plain silly.

                  My second issue is more complex. If all these different things really make a big difference, then people will want to micromanage them. If they don't make a big difference, then what's the point? So in either case I prefer the way we had it before that occasionally you can give a little boost to your speed by adding a tick or two. But otherwise there might only be the distinctions between strategic movement on your own/friendly territory. And the military guys didn't even really like that distinction.

                  We could try a system like you outlined at some point, but at least I'm fairly sure we won't like the results... thanks for giving a shot though.
                  Project Lead for The Clash of Civilizations
                  A Unique civ-like game that will feature low micromanagement, great AI, and a Detailed Government model including internal power struggles. Demo 8 available Now! (go to D8 thread at top of forum).
                  Check it out at the Clash Web Site and Forum right here at Apolyton!

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    I see your point, don't worry mark I'm not the kind of person to be crushed when someone points out the errors in my ideas. I'm just throughing out any idea I have

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      I was reading Krenske's unit model and I have a few thoughts

                      First off would it be a good idea for there to be comanders for units along with comanders for TFs? There could be a col. somebody who effects the morale along with adding (or subtracting) combat ability. Though in realistic terms it would only add a Tactical advantage such advantages can change the course of a battle. (look at Gettysburg) any thoughts?

                      I don't believe there is anything in the scout model for actual combat detectibility, or stealth. What I mean is simply not being able to find small forces because of their passive actions (like absorbing radar) rather then active actions (like destroying the radar towers). Though stealth is usually not thought of when ground units are discussed they are extremely important for modern goverments who want to keep their operations rather quiet, this would create an advantage in having a smaller force. Of course stealth isn't only important in psuedo-Spec-Ops operations (Army Rangers rather then delta force) but in any combat type.

                      Last thing, have we come up with (in either charactor or military models-i don't know which one it goes under) what specific effects the comander has on a TF (or Unit )?
                      [This message has been edited by LOGO (edited March 14, 2000).]

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Logo,

                        Their is nothing truly stopping Leaders being takeninto account at the individual unit level. The reason we haven't is that it appears to be a good way of interfacing with the Character model. It is assumed that the number of available characters will not be greater than 100 or so. (?) Having 1 per unit may not fit that model.

                        Of course the option is there to have the Command staff of the Unit modelled as various values with small random changes over time (representing the changeover of staff).


                        I believe that small special operations are best considered outside of a general combat model. But I agree stealth should be modelled , possibly at some tech level new special abilities become available to elements. This ability could carry a stealth value that acts as a modifier on the oppositions scouting chance. I imagine it should be fairly expensive to stealth a ground military unit as most of the detection and identification of ground units is done visually.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          I think I agree that we can't have a thousand charactors in this game, and sertainly naming someone as col. or something is micromanagement to the extreme. Maybe we could have an overall idea about training and intelligence of the unit comanders or even officers in general (not counting the actual Generals who you'll know about each specificly). For example, if you allocate your resources to making millions of grunts and see that the people who should lead your army should just be veteran grunts then that will do something. But if you invest in military academies and war colleges and spend much of your resouces on teaching your officers the art of war, along with giving them frequent war games should do something very different. There would be a few different ways to do this, first off building military academies and giving them resources. Second is use an idea i've thrown out a couple hundred time, a military docterine window, to allocate funding twoards war games and create an enviroment conducive to the type of officers you want. For example Iraq's officers were trained to fear Sadam and to do whatever he says without question, but once they were stranded they were unable to make decisions for them selves and surrenderd, on the other hand officers with a lot of freedom might just through a coupe or start a civil war. Along with that you could in that window control the type of tactics and strategies you want to fight with defaultly rather then have to click through all that stuff before a turn. I'm getting to much into interface so I'll stop.

                          About the stealth thing, the reason I was thinking of it was in the future (future meaning now-next twenty years) stealth of large scale land units will be more and more important. For example tanks with fiber-optic wires all over the body would make it almost invisible, a very powerful weapon. Or artillerie that can not be deteced by radar and has some kind of sound suppressor could really ruin an army's day. I don't think those types of stealth really work very well on the strategic level but they are extremely powerful on the tactical. Though I do agree with you that it is used so little in anciant times it should be a combat bonus.

                          I also agree that hard core spec-ops shouldn't be in the same realm as large armies. But I wasn't really talking about delta force/SEALS (unconventional warfare)but Rangers (smaller and more elite then regular forces but mostly conventional) I'm not that well versed in their use today so I'm not really sure what they'd go under.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            LOGO,

                            The Unit scale really bottoms out with approx 5 x 400 man elements. This is effectively a small brigade. Rangers and Commandos and occasionally even the SAS were fought in large formations but they were not able to translate their small unit unconventional sucess to the same degree on the larger scale. Effectively they just became well trained and sometimes highly experienced troops with good morale.

                            We could indeed include a couple of general leadership values that effect individual units. How though are we going to tie them to tactical and training doctrines. That is the question.

                            Initially we are looking at creating a standard model. We should be able to add to it fairly successfully later

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Logo,

                              Way I see things going with the charater model on the small scale is this: Things like military acadimeis, military spending on training etc will be included in the TF description. Currently I of the opinion that low level (under general) leaders can be be kinda lumped into the morale/experince of a unit. So a good leader would have a positive impact on morale and experince while a poor leader would result even good units a loss in morale (we hate this guy, F- him) as well as experince would go down, this would reflect the poor use of the troops (um, sarge why don't you go charge up that hill with all the entrenched enemy troops) rather than the troops being bad. This way it simplifies the number of things on the actual TF display. As for the interaction this will be on the level of the general commanding the TF.

                              As for stealth etc. Currently the model is designed to cope with history from ?? BC to 2000AD In terms of stealth I think it could probably factored into defense of the unit (if ya can't find me ya can't kill me) Also small unit actions (SEALS, Ranger etc) will be handeled speratley from this model.

                              anything else?

                              -Harli

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                The character model will have varying levels of characters around the world at a time from minimum of 1-2 to up to ~100 maximum. These may(not) include dynstatical characters. Not all will be available to 1 player, but divided among all players/computers civs.

                                I'm just letting you know this since you seem to be discussing the integration with that model, which is good.
                                Which Love Hina Girl Are You?
                                Mitsumi Otohime
                                Oh dear! Are you even sure you answered the questions correctly?) Underneath your confused exterior, you hold fast to your certainties and seek to find the truth about the things you don't know. While you may not be brimming with confidence and energy, you are content with who you are and accepting of both your faults and the faults of others. But while those around you love you deep down, they may find your nonchalance somewhat infuriating. Try to put a bit more thought into what you are doing, and be more aware of your surroundings.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X