evil atrocity weapons

[Ksim3000]

I think I've read that after launching three nukes, the game ends.

[aahz_capone]

3?!

[One_Dead_Villy]

no 7 or 8 is the limit from the beta

[HuangShang]

what happpens after 1 or 2 then?

[One_Dead_Villy]

nothing except someone is very unhappy

[HuangShang]

thought so...

[theponyguy1]

nukes

How much do nukes cost?

[aahz_capone]

and do you have anything else evil besides nukes ?

[HuangShang]

mass destruction is not that much more evil than any other weapons............

[Sava]

I'd like to use chemical gas attacks and some sort of biological attack. Gas was so prevelant in WW1 and in China during WW2. It's a shame that I haven't seen gas attacks in any games. Nukes are fun, but seemed out of place in EE. I don't understand how low range AAA can shoot down a B52... that's just dumb.

[HuangShang]

yeah, the nuke in EE was unrealistic, but at least very balanced

they made a "destroy all in range except Capitol" bomber that was slower and more vunerable to AA than convention bombers

so if AA are built to easily take out b52's but not b2s

[Sava]

I think these games in general need to have more emphasis put on realistic range, firepower, and vulnerability. I know from a game standpoint, that would be harder to create than the current RTS system... and probably would be less "beautiful" graphically. But I'm sick of games that just look good. I want realistic strategy... not the same old crap. AOE, AOE2, AOK, EE, AOM, and now RON... its ALL THE SAME

[HuangShang]

there r alot of real-base RTSs out there but its obviously not as popular

[Sava]

yeah and they suck

[aahz_capone]

I think they should go back to the Panzer General mode and RTSify that. Panzer General 1 and 2 were the most realistic games I've ever played when it comes to specific histrical qualities and tactics of war material.

and it had hexagons which will always rock.