If I recall MOO2 and Master of Magic both got scathing reviews -- now they're revered. If you like I can repost their reviews here.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MOO2 and MOM got a ton of bad reviews
Collapse
X
-
well here are some links. they did ok some were good some where bad.
Comment
-
Moo got great reviews
If I recall MOO2 and Master of Magic both got scathing reviews -- now they're revered. If you like I can repost their reviews here.
As the links show both MOOs got mostly very good to excellent reviews, including gold stars, editors choices ect. Remember this was in the days before the internet was popular so most reviews were from paper magazines.
MOM on the other hand did suffer because of the horrible bugs that it shipped with.
Comment
-
I thought this editor's disclaimer was funny in the MOO2 re-review after patch 1.31 came out:
: While this game has been out for some time, our first review was done without the hindsight of several months' play"Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
"I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
"Stuie is right...." - Guynemer
Comment
-
What's really funny is this review
Talking about MoO2 in glowing terms, calling himself a fanboy of the series. Amazingly good praise.
And read who did the review...
Comment
-
Oh come on Kalbear we all know that Tom Chick is a clueless 18 year old newbie, who lacks the mental capacity to play anything more complicated than Half Life. Tom hates all games because he can't get a date.
Tom has never even played MOO 1 and MOO 2. That review was actually written after the MOO3 review and just back dated to give him crediability.
Help me out if I missed any other criticisms of Tom...
LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by kalbear
What's really funny is this review
Talking about MoO2 in glowing terms, calling himself a fanboy of the series. Amazingly good praise.
And read who did the review...
Ugh. Diplomacy blew in MOO2, and he makes some other questionable observations, to my eye...I now have a VERY good reason to disregard Chick's MOO3 rant...
-infidelLast edited by Infidel; February 25, 2003, 19:48.
Comment
-
Screw what the reviewers say. They've got me to go out and by a ton of games which I didn't like. They've rubbished games I love. These reviewers are often overloaded on games (too much of a good thing) plus some of them review genres they are not into and so can miss the point. They have a deadline to meet and are not in a relaxed-take-your-time mode.Avoid COLONY RUSH on Galactic Civlizations II (both DL & DA) with my Slow Start Mod.
Finding Civ 4: Colonization too easy? Try my Ten Colonies challenge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kalbear
What's really funny is this review
Talking about MoO2 in glowing terms, calling himself a fanboy of the series. Amazingly good praise.
And read who did the review...
Now I am even more sure that the opinion of this guy is irrelevant for me. Especially the insulting comment to Master of Magic enraged me. Even with all its bugs (and there are many) and poor diplomacy (almost non-existent) it is my all-time-favourite game. Maybe feature-creep is not so bad.
Starlord
Comment
Comment