Brad just posted a link to a reviewer he holds in great personal esteem. http://www.gamingnexus.com/Default.a...Article&I=1019
I'd be interested to hear particularly from Sirian, Solver and Gufnork on how such a seasoned reviewer, who alledgedly took a while to put the reviewer together, draws such a different experience from you guys?
It's an honest question asked out of genuine curiosity. Does that guy just have a lower bar? Does he value different aspects of the game more highly that you do? The divide here doesn't seem to be the typical "The graphics suck." vs. "I'd play games on a cocktail napkin." A lot of the same concepts get raised across the reviews and here, but the conclusions seem so at odds.
I'd be interested to hear particularly from Sirian, Solver and Gufnork on how such a seasoned reviewer, who alledgedly took a while to put the reviewer together, draws such a different experience from you guys?
It's an honest question asked out of genuine curiosity. Does that guy just have a lower bar? Does he value different aspects of the game more highly that you do? The divide here doesn't seem to be the typical "The graphics suck." vs. "I'd play games on a cocktail napkin." A lot of the same concepts get raised across the reviews and here, but the conclusions seem so at odds.
Comment