One of the clues is for a different game ? Now that's adding an extra challenge
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Name the game - part 6
Collapse
X
-
Kropotkin, not that one...but you're hot hot HOT!Skeptics should forego any thought of convincing the unconvinced that we hold the torch of truth illuminating the darkness. A more modest, realistic, and achievable goal is to encourage the idea that one may be mistaken. Doubt is humbling and constructive; it leads to rational thought in weighing alternatives and fully reexamining options, and it opens unlimited vistas.
Elie A. Shneour Skeptical Inquirer
Comment
-
Activision, Ancient greece but with machines, mid 80's
Pitfall Harry?
(well ok thats Aztecs....but......)
oh no wait forget the above is it Decatholon?'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you.info here. prove me wrong.
Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CapTVK
Kropotkin, not that one...but you're hot hot HOT!
Is it Sibot? i think it was called, something like that??'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you.info here. prove me wrong.
Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.
Comment
-
No, that doesn't fit in with the other clues i've given. This ain't no game remember?
That Crawford game would be " The betrayal of Siboot" sort of a negotiation game with emotion icons. Actually tried it out once but couldn't get into it. But no, that ain't it either...but Kropotkin is very close! I can't say any more.Skeptics should forego any thought of convincing the unconvinced that we hold the torch of truth illuminating the darkness. A more modest, realistic, and achievable goal is to encourage the idea that one may be mistaken. Doubt is humbling and constructive; it leads to rational thought in weighing alternatives and fully reexamining options, and it opens unlimited vistas.
Elie A. Shneour Skeptical Inquirer
Comment
-
Mind Mirror? I don't know how it scores on some of the other criteria, but I certainly call EA "scum" on occasion
Comment
-
Some good guesses, all around but no cigar.
I think every software company has been called scum at least once in its life.Skeptics should forego any thought of convincing the unconvinced that we hold the torch of truth illuminating the darkness. A more modest, realistic, and achievable goal is to encourage the idea that one may be mistaken. Doubt is humbling and constructive; it leads to rational thought in weighing alternatives and fully reexamining options, and it opens unlimited vistas.
Elie A. Shneour Skeptical Inquirer
Comment
-
Originally posted by CapTVK
No, that doesn't fit in with the other clues i've given. This ain't no game remember?
That Crawford game would be " The betrayal of Siboot" sort of a negotiation game with emotion icons. Actually tried it out once but couldn't get into it. But no, that ain't it either...but Kropotkin is very close! I can't say any more.
er terrible guess just cause it popped into my head and i need rid of it:
'Little Computer People'?'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you.info here. prove me wrong.
Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.
Comment
-
No, not LCP either...it's still classified as a 'game'
Perhaps a final riddle....
As time went by Homer had a story to tell
How mankind had gone to heaven or hell
So where does lie mankind's final fate?
It's in the name of this imposing gateSkeptics should forego any thought of convincing the unconvinced that we hold the torch of truth illuminating the darkness. A more modest, realistic, and achievable goal is to encourage the idea that one may be mistaken. Doubt is humbling and constructive; it leads to rational thought in weighing alternatives and fully reexamining options, and it opens unlimited vistas.
Elie A. Shneour Skeptical Inquirer
Comment
-
just based on that last clue:
'Valhalla'? (ok it is a game, but when is a game not a game?)
no one can say i've not been trying but i'm finding this one especially tuff - and i get the feeling i havent played this game, but have no doubt heard about it - dont you just hate that'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you.info here. prove me wrong.
Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.
Comment
-
Nope, that ain't it either....but you're all heading in the right direction, keep going!Skeptics should forego any thought of convincing the unconvinced that we hold the torch of truth illuminating the darkness. A more modest, realistic, and achievable goal is to encourage the idea that one may be mistaken. Doubt is humbling and constructive; it leads to rational thought in weighing alternatives and fully reexamining options, and it opens unlimited vistas.
Elie A. Shneour Skeptical Inquirer
Comment
Comment