Turn 5 to quinns!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Forever Future mod: first PBEM game thread
Collapse
X
-
Quinns had drawn my attention to an in-game bug that I wasn't aware of. As you probably know, rush buying has a different gold-to-production ratio depending on the nature of the thing you're buying - improvements are cheaper, while the units and wonders are more expensive.
The exploit is to rush-buy a building and then change it to an unit of comparable price, thus getting the unit much cheaper.
I'm intending to adress the issue in the next edition of the mod, but for now:
Do we trust each another enough to make a gentlemanly agreement that we'll refrain from using that exploit, or should I prepare updated game files, that will brutally level the rush buy cost to a constant gold-to-production ratio? I'm voting for the former option. Please speak up.
Comment
-
Max, it doesn't have to be to a "unit of comparable price", it will allow you to change it to ANY unit. It's a bad bug, and it was bad enough to break up another ranking website dedicated to CTP called "gameleague" (I think that was the name). Some players used the bug without telling anyone about it (and it does make a huge difference). Then when others found out that some of the top players had done that, they were outraged and many split from the group. It was nearly impossible to trace who used the bug in "online multiplayer" (which is what gameleague was) but in PBEM it is quite easy to check (after the game is over -- or during the game with an unbiased observer who checks the PBEM files). We've never had a problem with it once we banned it.
Comment
-
Anyway, I'm keeping all the turns, so they will be available for inspection after the gameLast edited by Max_Smirnov; April 20, 2011, 00:29.
Comment
-
Vikings stare in awe at their brand new f**khuge dried-clay granary, the fruit of generations of 12-hour-a-day labour, wondering what the heck do they need such a megalithic building for.
Also, 10 to quinns.
There is one more thing: building a city on a pre-existing mine or farm is considered a cheat on the CTP ladder. I propose to allow for that. If someone is willing to go to such lenghts to make a city a little more powerful, I don't see a problem with that. Especially since this helps making plain cities competitive to forest cities. Of course, if anyone vetoes it, we won't use that exploit.
PS. I didn't miss that Elton John referenceLast edited by Max_Smirnov; April 21, 2011, 17:03.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Max_Smirnov View PostPS. I didn't miss that Elton John reference
Comment
Comment