Super League *9 Reports

[checkMate]

The order of the standings is just the same every time.

At the moment the Ancients are in the lead by percentages.

However if you take the limit of 0/0 as infinite, then
SCF has the lead

[Keygen]

Hatchy must have forgot about it despite my reminder so here it is:

Hatchy (Raging Hordes) > Keygen (Ancients)

It is about turn 9 of our 1x1 game.

[Mathemagician]

Originally posted by checkMate
The order of the standings is just the same every time.

At the moment the Ancients are in the lead by percentages.

However if you take the limit of 0/0 as infinite, then
SCF has the lead

actually i would assume the limit of 0/0 as 1, but then that's just me. the official standpoint of mathematicians is that there is no limit of 0/0.

so, checkMate, if the tie-breakers should become an issue for the league, will the percentage count, the difference or the absolute number of points ?

[Keygen]

I think the average (percentage) would be the most appropriate but there might be a problem if bonus points from fast wins are added. A combination of these two could resolve that, e.g. calculating *9 points as an avarage apart from fast winning points and sum all together.

But according to the rules I think absolute number of points is currently in effect.

[Mathemagician]

Originally posted by Keygen
I think the average (percentage) would be the most appropriate but there might be a problem if bonus points from fast wins are added. A combination of these two could resolve that, e.g. calculating *9 points as an avarage apart from fast winning points and sum all together.

But according to the rules I think absolute number of points is currently in effect.

yes. i suggest, until someone comes up with something very plausible, we leave it this way..

however...
if the difference of points won to possible points would count, then there wouldn't be a need for the fast win bonus anymore, since the lower ranked player would be more inclined to concede if he doesnt see a chance to win the game anymore.

just an idea..

[Protoss72000]

Originally posted by checkMate


I didn't realize you guys started your round 2 game !!

hmm, is it a round 2 game, nimrod made it so i started playing, its not a problem is it?

[hatschy]

Originally posted by Keygen
Hatchy must have forgot about it despite my reminder so here it is:

Hatchy (Raging Hordes) > Keygen (Ancients)

It is about turn 9 of our 1x1 game.

I tried to post yesterday, but Apolyton did not respond . Ok this is 1x1 match #61 Keygen vs. Hatschy, Hatschy leading at turn 9 .

[hatschy]

1x1 match #6, Hatschy vs. Nimrod, Hatschy leading at turn 9 .

[hatschy]

Oh, and 1x1 match #5, Hatschy vs. yoda, Hatschy leading at turn 39 .

[Mathemagician]

game #3
turn 69

Mathemagician (ELF) maintains a slight lead over David (Raging Hordes).

[david42one]

Originally posted by Mathemagician
game #3
turn 69

Mathemagician (ELF) maintains a slight lead over David (Raging Hordes).

He means turn 79. Dammit.

[Mathemagician]

Originally posted by david42one


He means turn 79. Dammit.

Oops.
thank you david.
hope you're not that attentive in our game.

[checkMate]

Originally posted by Protoss72000


hmm, is it a round 2 game, nimrod made it so i started playing, its not a problem is it?

No not really a problem, the idea was to hold off the round 2 1x1 games so that there would be something to do while waiting for the long 2x2 games to finish, and also to put in a form of revenge. The 2nd round game is revenge for the 1st. But since its started its started no troubles. Go ahead.

[FlameFlash]

Round 2?

[FlameFlash]

Originally posted by checkMate


Just remember before you attack him

That's a good point... gumpold... could you send me a mail regarding all our 2x2 games? Especially when you first see me? Also, be sure to offer an alliance ASAP once we make contact.