I think not only should those be punished that flame others, but those as well who feed them. If you respond to a flame, you should be restricted the same as the flamer.
Why is only Asher banned, when it's actually the Agathon-Asher combination or the Urban Ranger-Asher combination?
That way, possibly users will stop responding to the flamers, who will (because they WANT to talk to someone) have to change their manners to reach the people.
Is this worth a try or complete bull****? Respond to a flame and you are toast as well - ignoring is the better strategy.
In any case, if this is not made to be "law" here, is it a good thing for your consideration on how to cope with flames?
Discuss.
Why is only Asher banned, when it's actually the Agathon-Asher combination or the Urban Ranger-Asher combination?
That way, possibly users will stop responding to the flamers, who will (because they WANT to talk to someone) have to change their manners to reach the people.
Is this worth a try or complete bull****? Respond to a flame and you are toast as well - ignoring is the better strategy.
In any case, if this is not made to be "law" here, is it a good thing for your consideration on how to cope with flames?
Discuss.
Comment