Other games.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
where should board games be discussed?
Collapse
X
-
-
But doesnt that apply to a lot of games other than board games? Most of the less popular older games?Originally posted by Skanky Burns
To stay on the first page of the OG forum, a thread would need a new reply in at least every three days. The Classic Games forum still has threads on the first page from June."A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Comment
-
I applaud LOTM in discovering a way to add more +1's to a given topic; create a thread in the A/C to discuss where it should be placed.
I'm consitently stupid- Japher
I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned
Comment
-
Not in my experience. If an old game is good enough and someone is feeling nostalgic enough to start a thread on the game, chances are others are also feeling nostalgic about that game. Seeing the thread will be enough to get them playing that game as well for a while. And even if people don't play the game, they have enough knowledge and experience to talk about the game still.Originally posted by lord of the mark
But doesnt that apply to a lot of games other than board games? Most of the less popular older games?I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).
Comment
-
Does anyone actually ever look in classic though?Originally posted by Skanky Burns
Boardgame discussion would probably be better in Classic Games. FGs in he OG are continuously bumped, the only threads to survive are those that also have a number of people also playing the game at the time. Threads about boardgames would drop like a rock. Survivability and visability for such a thread would be far greater in the Classic Games forum.
At least, thats my take on it.
Comment
-
Depends. I once posted on 1602 AD, and it sank like a rock. Even a Sid Meiers Gettysburg thread sank like a rock. Any wargame thread other than 5 start generals, and maybe TOAW, tends to sink like a rock. Sometimes it depends on whos around - sometimes one particular individual may be interested, and if they happen to look in OG, than something gets going. But id say that for Wargames and other niche genres you get less response than youd get for Risk or Monopoly.Originally posted by Skanky Burns
Not in my experience. If an old game is good enough and someone is feeling nostalgic enough to start a thread on the game, chances are others are also feeling nostalgic about that game. Seeing the thread will be enough to get them playing that game as well for a while. And even if people don't play the game, they have enough knowledge and experience to talk about the game still."A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Comment
-
the people who are interested in Colonization and MoM do, but thats about it, I think.Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Does anyone actually ever look in classic though?"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Comment
-
Seems they'd better go in ClassicWhy can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
Comment
-
Nobody ever goes there, not even me.Originally posted by Skanky Burns
Survivability and visability for such a thread would be far greater in the Classic Games forum.
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Comment
Comment