What's hard to fathom is the difference between -v- France and -v- Scotland. They struggled in the first half -v- France for precisely the reason they struggled -v- Scotland, outnumbered and outmuscled in and around the breakdown, slow ball, no Plan B to deal with the lack of quick ball. Against France they numbered and muscled up in the second half and looked better. Not so against Scotland and I don't know why. The likes of Flood were disappearing into the breakdowns trying to clear out.
Youngs is on a steep learning curve. Life's a whole lot easier on the front foot with quick ball. He's looked a whole lot less certain with serious pressure applied. Flood, too, has struggled. The wide open spaces -v- Italy are a memory. Credit to France and Scotland, they plotted and planned, but weren't good enough to capitalise.
Ireland are the champion slowers of the ball as their penalty count shows. They've also worked on holding up the tackled player which has been very effective. If Ireland aren't penalised off the park for slowing the ball, and/or if England don't show more nouse, it could be interesting again. England should dominate the scrummage but they did against Scotland. Their problems are elsewhere.
Youngs is on a steep learning curve. Life's a whole lot easier on the front foot with quick ball. He's looked a whole lot less certain with serious pressure applied. Flood, too, has struggled. The wide open spaces -v- Italy are a memory. Credit to France and Scotland, they plotted and planned, but weren't good enough to capitalise.
Ireland are the champion slowers of the ball as their penalty count shows. They've also worked on holding up the tackled player which has been very effective. If Ireland aren't penalised off the park for slowing the ball, and/or if England don't show more nouse, it could be interesting again. England should dominate the scrummage but they did against Scotland. Their problems are elsewhere.
Comment