Originally posted by Havak
Not exactly – if i understand correctly then the criteria under which the TMO can be referred to has been altered so that it is not looking for positives but instead looking for negatives. He therefore no longer has to see the grounding to award a try – but he has to see some proof of non-grounding in order not to. It’s a clear move to favour the attacking side – although I doubt they would admit that so overtly.
Not exactly – if i understand correctly then the criteria under which the TMO can be referred to has been altered so that it is not looking for positives but instead looking for negatives. He therefore no longer has to see the grounding to award a try – but he has to see some proof of non-grounding in order not to. It’s a clear move to favour the attacking side – although I doubt they would admit that so overtly.
Proof of non-grounding? That he didn't see it grounded!
That young hooker would be Stephen Moore (Reds)? The ARU website makes it nice and easy to browse your ‘spring tour’ squad.
That’s the new criteria – it’s a try unless you SEE evidence otherwise.
It's a try unless the evidence the TMO sees is that the player didn't ground the ball!
They’ve also trialing a ‘no tolerance’ policy as well by the way. Can’t see Georgy Gregan coping with that too well?



Comment