My sad confession...

[-Jrabbit]

You clearly pay close attention to the news, Geronimo. And you are not, from what I can see, an actual idiot. And yet, in an election where the choice could not be more clearly differentiated, you somehow claim to be undecided. Frankly, if this is true, you show signs of being exactly the kind of person who let themselves be talked into electing the Nazi coalition that handed Hitler the keys to 1933 Germany. The parallels are eerily obvious.

But you're not a proven idiot, therefore I don't believe you are actually undecided.

As I see it, the only logical explanations are: (1) You are unwilling to take the heat from declaring your actual intent, and/or (2) you are just being needy for attention.

[Dauphin]

I wonder how many shy-Republicans-voting-Democrat are out there. People who will vote for Kamala, but can never admit that they will to their Republican friends, but like all good Republicans^TM have no problem hiding their dirty little secret. Liz Cheney and other Republicans for Kamal are open about it, how many are not?

If there is an effect, will it be stronger than the Bradley Effect, where people actually like a bit of white Trumpian dominance over a non-white women but can't admit it.

Would be my hypothesis if the polls are well off and it's not as close as made out to be.

[Geronimo]

You clearly pay close attention to the news, Geronimo. And you are not, from what I can see, an actual idiot. And yet, in an election where the choice could not be more clearly differentiated, you somehow claim to be undecided. Frankly, if this is true, you show signs of being exactly the kind of person who let themselves be talked into electing the Nazi coalition that handed Hitler the keys to 1933 Germany. The parallels are eerily obvious.

But you're not a proven idiot, therefore I don't believe you are actually undecided.

As I see it, the only logical explanations are: (1) You are unwilling to take the heat from declaring your actual intent, and/or (2) you are just being needy for attention.

I just feel like I'm not comfortable giving my vote to any candidate this election and I suppose I should lay out my serious objections to Kamala to explain that but at this point I think if I want to be comfortable voting for Harris it seems safer to fish for more ammo against Trump. That might be "needy" I suppose. Apologies if that's offensive. Maybe it would be better if I laid out everything I hate about Harris and some of the feedback here might actually spin that in a useful way but I'm worried instead I'll realize that Trump's absurdity as a POTUS candidate is all there is for a foil against any of that so it could backfire

[Lorizael]

It's perfectly fine to just vote against a candidate. Someday Republicans won't nominate Trump anymore and maybe then you might want to weigh this candidate's policies vs. that one's, etc., but that is simply not where we are right now. You've got an incurious, bigoted, narcissistic, felonious, insurrectionist rapist with declining mental faculties who's surrounded himself with vocal white supremacists vs. not that. Not that is great.

[N35t0r]

Bottom line is, come November 5, either Trump or Harris will come out as the president elect of the USA, and you have three options:
A vote for Harris
A vote for Trump
Half a vote for each

It's up to you to decide which of these the to take.

[The Mad Monk]

Trump Jr. is pitching gold for Birch Gold Group.

[The Mad Monk]

Trump Sr. is selling gold watches -- surprisingly not out of the back of a car.

[Elok]

If you don't happen to live in a swing state, it's irrelevant. If you do ... it's probably still irrelevant, because math. Personally, I'm going to write in Justin Amash (Chase Oliver is pro-choice and I intend my meaningless protest vote to send the purest possible signal). Only going to the ballot at all to slap down some amendments to the state constitution.