Trump.

[Dinner]

That garbage case will get tossed out and we all know it. The judge literally told the jury they didn't have to agree about what he did in order to find him guilty. Which goes directly against multiple supreme court rulings going back over 100 years. I guess you don't care about the constitution actually being followed though. No, it seems your partisanship doesn't care about little things like that.

[Ming]

It is amazing that Ming didn't bother to learn even the basics of the ruling, much less the legal facts, yet still wants to falsely claim bias simply because the facts of the case didn't support the partisan outcome he wanted.

Gee... I noticed you didn't even mention the first case he was actually convicted on by a court of law. All legal.
In the second case, you seem to claim that I want a specific outcome. BS. I never said I did, just your normal partisan hack job.
If he is indeed guilty of crimes with the documents, he should be held accountable just like anybody else.
If not. So be it.
And we will see how everything goes on appeal.

It must be nice to be Trump... All the money in the world to hire the best lawyers, deal with judges he appointed, and get the type of "justice" that most people can't. A true two tier justice system.

[Uncle Sparky]

Most political parties in Canada let all the members of that party vote in leadership races, either through mail-in ballots, or on-line. Delegate conventions often cater to special interest groups, so what do you do if you are a party member in the US, and your party has been taken over by a special interest group?
And wasn't it the US founding fathers that started the 'ballots or bullets' movement?

[Dinner]

It is amazing that Ming didn't bother to learn even the basics of the ruling, much less the legal facts, yet still wants to falsely claim bias simply because the facts of the case didn't support the partisan outcome he wanted.

[Dinner]

For those interested in reality the court found that the DOJ needs to actually follow the constitution and that means principal officers have to be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. None of that was done with Jack Smith. Furthermore, the DOJ has been illegally diverting funds earmarked for a special counsel but Congress had repealed the law authorizing special counsels. So the law the DOJ used to justify appointing Jack Smith doesn't even exist because Congress repealed it

A completely unlawful partisan witch hunt from start to finish.

https://www.youtube.com/live/skjEOLBY_m4?si=HtLXtfS4xR2iONlm

[Dinner]

[Ming]

Trump had faced charges stemming from special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into his possession of classified materials at Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence. He pleaded not guilty to all 37 felony counts from Smith’s probe, including willful retention of national defense information, conspiracy to obstruct justice and false statements. 37 bogus charges thrown in the garbage. In NY convicted of all. See the difference between law and a kangaroo court ming???

Yep... In New York, the law actually worked. While in the documents case, a biased judge that he appointed threw out the case for reasons that had actually nothing do with the actual charges, and will be appealed. I do indeed see the difference.

[Dinner]

If Smith's appointment was improper than Smith also brought the politically motivated case in D.C..

[My Wife Hates CIV]

Trump had faced charges stemming from special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into his possession of classified materials at Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence. He pleaded not guilty to all 37 felony counts from Smith’s probe, including willful retention of national defense information, conspiracy to obstruct justice and false statements. 37 bogus charges thrown in the garbage. In NY convicted of all. See the difference between law and a kangaroo court ming???

[-Jrabbit]

The Heritage Foundation's Orban in '25 plan is the threat.
And given the chance, Trump will let it happen.

[-Jrabbit]

This continual insistence that only one side of the aisle is a threat is just effing idiotic.

[-Jrabbit]

Thanks for sharing that "unconfirmed report," aka kneejerk BS.

[-Jrabbit]

LOL @ suggesting "lies and demonization" is somehow "the left."

[Dinner]

What type of autistic person spams eight pages of garbage?

[Broken_Erika]