Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Politics Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ming
    replied
    Gee... somebody bought his place for more than some claimed it was worth. Good for him.
    This in NO WAY compares to Trumps long term and systematic fraud.
    But feel free to be outraged while ignoring your hero's fraud.
    It's not even close...

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    What facts? The 1st sentence begins with the assumption people making loans relied on Trump to decide what his property is worth.

    Tbf to Jon Stewart I imagine his abode brought a nice profit just because he lived there. But still, a property assessed for taxes at 800k+ with a market value of 1.8m sells twice for 17.5m and then 13.5m sounds like a very sweet deal for Jon. I wonder if the new owner had to pay property taxes for a house that cost $17.5m or did they argue for the old assessment Jon had?

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBMan
    replied
    Isn't it fundamentally unfair to rely on facts and reason in this thread??? Next someone will ask if he can use logic

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

    But is it fraud? Seems commonplace. Who lost money? Loans were made and paid off. The people making the loans evaluated the worth of Trump's property when negotiating the terms. This isn't about Trump, this is a political prosecution selectively targeting him. Its like a traffic cop watching a convoy of cars all moving at the same speed and pulling over the car with a MAGA sticker... or the black motorist.
    Loans were provided at beneficial rates due to false valuations, assertions and pledges that understated the credit risk and upon which lenders explicitly relied upon. The rate of return they should have gained from the loans was below what it ought to have been. It is irrelevant that there was no default.

    It is incorrect to state that 'everybody' does it. Valuations are subjective certainly, but where it is egregious (as in this case), it should be, and is, rightfully pursued.

    Check the DoJ press releases and you'll see plenty of criminal cases resulting from fraudulent valuations. Usually as part of a conspiracy between assessors and property owners. In Trump's case he was doing self-valuations, and pursued civilly (which is harder to track and compare as it is usual less transparent and less high profile than similar criminal cases).

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Gov Greg Abbott (R-Tex) signed an executive order requiring institutions of higher education review their free speech codes and increase punishments for antisemitic comments

    you can still call Palestinians names and endorse genocide

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    commented on 's reply
    to be fair, a criminal court convicting anybody through political motivation would be a very serious scenario indeed.

  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Ming View Post
    It's worth noting that the maga crowd believes all of Trump lies and spreads them on social media.
    I would go so far as to say that this is how I define "the maga crowd".

    Leave a comment:


  • Ming
    replied
    Yawn...
    Trump was convicted. FACT
    I see you are still making excuses for him, while blaming all the worlds problems on Biden.
    Do you have a "cute/childish" nickname for Trump, or is that only for Biden?

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Jon Stewart railed against Trump for paying lower taxes on property based on low assessments. Stewart sold his NYC duplex for $17.5m while the market price was $1.8m and tax assessment of $840k

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    The state routinely misrepresents property values to increase taxes and neither they or the banks loaning Trump money depend on his assessments. If the banks and Trump have a disagreement thats between them and a civil court. If Trump owes taxes he can pay them just like Hunter and the Big Guy while the rest of us watch 2 evils playing king of the moral high ground. Democrats howled when Trump told Ukraine to investigate Biden but now they cheer selective political prosecutions. Lock them both up

  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    "Everybody does it" is not a defense.

    And deliberately misrepresenting the value of a property to get a better loan rate -- just like the flip side, misrepresenting that same property's value to get lower property taxes -- is fraud.

  • Ming
    commented on 's reply
    Still defending him... A court of law convicted him.
    He is NOT above the law.

  • Berzerker
    replied
    Nicolle Wallace at MSNBC was outraged her employer would hire that lying election denier Ronna McDaniel

    Nicolle Wallace was a spokeswoman for George Bush's WH during his wars following 9/11

    "I need a time machine to travel back to 2006 and tell Dems: less than 20 years from now, the spokeswoman for Bush and Cheney will be a hero and icon to American liberals without having changed a single one of her views, and will deliver popular sermons on the sanctity of Truth:" - Glenn Greenwald

    I don't know if that's true, was she pro-life back then? Becoming pro-choice is a big plus.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    Then why didn't the victims sue?

  • Ming
    replied
    Yes it's FRAUD. And that is what an actual court CONVICTED him of.
    But again... you defend a criminal. But like the rest of the maga crowd and him, you believe laws don't apply to him.
    You make excuses, use bad examples and believe his lies... while ignoring that he was actually convicted and now has to pay the penalty, just like everybody else that has been convicted of FRAUD.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X