Silly liberals

[Dinner]

Q: 'What did you have for lunch?'
A: 'You're fake news, rigged election, witch-hunt, worst treated President in history.....'

Tell us you didn't watch it without saying you didn't watch it.

[BeBMan]

Q: 'What did you have for lunch?'
A: 'You're fake news, rigged election, witch-hunt, worst treated President in history.....'

Q: 'What did you have for lunch?'
A: 'See for yourself, the writing is on the wall'

[Donegeal]

And I'll tell you right now, if it's trump v Biden again, I'll vote AGAINST trump again.

[Berzerker]

to the last Ukrainian

[Geronimo]

I'd probably vote for ukraine by voting for Biden in that match up despite the fact that otherwise Biden may be an even worse president than trump.

[Dauphin]

Tell us you didn't watch it without saying you didn't watch it.

I assume Biden goofed up on something, but then I wasn't responding to that, I was commenting on the BC'c comment that it was the Trump method. I was saying Trump doesn't pick client journalists because he doesn't need to.

[BeBMan]

In the next Biden/Trump pres debate Biden will chop off Trump's arm and reveal that he is Donald's father.

[Dinner]

Biden is ramping up the racial hate because he is behind in the polls. Since 2012 Dems have relied upon inflaming racial hatred as a key part of their election strategy. They need to motivate racial minorities to turn up to vote for the and they have found claiming secret racism exists against them is a great way to get them to do that. This expect Democraps to run the race batting lies up to 11 hoping a big enough black turn out can save brain dead Biden and his crap policies of deliberately harming the economy.

[Jon Miller]

How many mass murders have been carried out by white nationalists versus radical racial minorities?

I remember something from the Times https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/17/briefing/right-wing-mass-shootings.html .

JM

[Berzerker]

Why do the racial minorities have to be radical? I've seen the crime stats, BLM was based on a lie and black people attack other races at higher rates. Imagine attacking people because of their race while shouting 'racist!' at the victims.

[Dauphin]

Why do the racial minorities have to be radical? I've seen the crime stats, BLM was based on a lie and black people attack other races at higher rates. Imagine attacking people because of their race while shouting 'racist!' at the victims.

Your premise may be true, or not. You should always questions crime stats. They are notoriously unreliable. The vast majority of crime goes unreported and they suffer huge observational bias.

As an example. Let's say that law enforcement has a bias against people from Group A (expressed through their discretion to record a crime). Or that persons from Group A are more likely to discretionarily report a crime due to more trust in law enforcement. Or any other reason that may skew figures at point of measurement.

Person from Group A assaults person from Group B. Bias means it is more likely than average to result in entry into crime stats.
Person from Group B assaults person from Group A. Bias means it is less likely than average to result entry into crime stats.
Crime stats show Group A assault Group B more than the other way around, even when prevalence is equal.

[Berzerker]

That could be true for the selective enforcement of victimless crimes like drugs, not so much when victims are filing police reports. But if the local politicians tell the cops to stop arresting people for assault or letting defendants out with little or no bail the effect you describe actually results in a lower number of assaults getting prosecuted and convicted. Given how the media erupts when a white man attacks a black person but remains muted when the opposite happens, I dont think what you're describing works to inflate black on white crime.

[Dauphin]

That could be true for the selective enforcement of victimless crimes like drugs, not so much when victims are filing police reports.

You assume that victims usually file police reports. And that they do so equally across demographics. They don't.

Given how the media erupts when a white man attacks a black person but remains muted when the opposite happens

Using media outrage on cases as a barometer is anecdotal. Plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not data.

[Dauphin]

It may well be black on white crime is more prevalent. I am saying that demonstrating with crime data is fraught with difficulty. And pre-supposing it will likely lead you to confirmation bias.

[Berzerker]

You assume that victims usually file police reports. And that they do so equally across demographics. They don't.

Given how the media erupts when a white man attacks a black person but remains muted when the opposite happens

Using media outrage on cases as a barometer is anecdotal. Plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not data.

I assume crimes with victims get reported at higher rates than victimless crimes that allow biased cops to selectively enforce laws. This is even more true for homicide, cops dont typically ignore dead bodies unless they're so overwhelmed they cant properly investigate every death and thats more likely to happen in high crime areas. Media outrage results in more prosecutions and convictions and that outrage is rarely if ever focused on black perpetrators.

BLM accused cops of being racist murderers hunting down innocent black people based on how many (mostly men) are killed by cops. That was a despicable lie that got more people killed. Black men have a higher chance of being killed by cops because they comprise the demographic most likely to be involved in violent encounters reported to the police. If black men commit a 1/3rd of the homicides I would expect black men to be about a 1/3rd of the people killed by cops. Younger men are killed by cops at higher rates but nobody cries ageism or sexism.