It appears Roe is toast

[Kidishious]

And yeah I'm for a women's right to choose too, just not at a cost of 60 million baby lives. That's ****ing insane.

[giblets]

nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

anti-choicers deprive women of liberty.

[Elok]

pro-choicers deprive unborn children of life YAY WE CAN READ MODERN IDEAS ABOUT ABORTION INTO A TEXT INTENDED TO THWART LYNCHING can we please stop now?

[giblets]

14th amendment clearly mentions being "born"

[N35t0r]

And yeah I'm for a women's right to choose too, just not at a cost of 60 million baby lives. That's ****ing insane.

What is insane is that the US has a child mortality rate more comparable to developing countries than to other developed countries. If you really cared about "babies", you'd tackle that first.

[Elok]

What is insane is that the US has a child mortality rate more comparable to developing countries than to other developed countries. If you really cared about "babies", you'd tackle that first.

Suppose, for a moment, that it is legal to drop your toddler into a wood-chipper. You focus on banning the wood-chipper, ignoring factors that might make individuals less likely to rent a wood-chipper and other, non-wood-chipper ways kids can die. How monstrous a hypocrite are you for doing so?

EDIT: Also dammit what do we have to do to get rid of Kid

[dannubis]

Add him to your ignore list. If he doesn't get attention he will go away.

[N35t0r]

Suppose, for a moment, that it is legal to drop your toddler into a wood-chipper. You focus on banning the wood-chipper, ignoring factors that might make individuals less likely to rent a wood-chipper and other, non-wood-chipper ways kids can die. How monstrous a hypocrite are you for doing so?

EDIT: Also dammit what do we have to do to get rid of Kid

I'd try to portray the wood chipper as a weapon, and then have the NRA defend my god-given right to own wood-chippers, clearly.

[giblets]

Suppose, for a moment, that it is legal to drop your toddler into a wood-chipper. You focus on banning the wood-chipper, ignoring factors that might make individuals less likely to rent a wood-chipper and other, non-wood-chipper ways kids can die. How monstrous a hypocrite are you for doing so?

EDIT: Also dammit what do we have to do to get rid of Kid

You (in this hypothetical) also actively oppose any attempts at establishing universal healthcare.

[N35t0r]

More seriously though, I guess it depends on the level of rhetoric I used in my anti-woodchipper crusade, where wood-chipper toddler deaths stood in relation to overall toddler deaths, and what other efforts were being made by both pro-chipping enthusiasts and other groups figting other sources of toddler death (this is assuming my crusade was based on the fact that I found toddler deaths abhorrent, and not that I found wood chippers an abomination that should be eradicated for other reasons).
If, say, I was heavily anti-chipper to preserve those lovely toddlers, but also both promoted toddler labor in wood pulping industries, as well as against government-enforced safety regulations in wood pulping machines...

Alternatively, if the anti-chipper movement was massive and very well funded, but of 20k toddler deaths per year only 4 were chippings, a majority of the others were from another easily preventable cause and very little was being done to combat those...

[Elok]

Because people tend to be more scared of murder than accidental deaths? I looked it up once and drunk driving accounts for roughly three 9/11s each year, or did. Yet we as a nation lost our **** after the towers fell, while doing little to address drunk driving. Also the pro-life movement is a coalition assembled for one particular foe and is not necessarily going to agree on ways and means on any other, etc.

[Kidishious]

What is insane is that the US has a child mortality rate more comparable to developing countries than to other developed countries. If you really cared about "babies", you'd tackle that first.

Did 60 million babies get murdered in some other way?

[Kidishious]

A NYTimes journalist seemed to suggest that she wanted conservative justices on the Supreme Court to have their "white" daughters raped and impregnated by "black men" in a tweet.

[Kidishious]

Sorry. She's a writer, not a journalist. Or I'm not sure which. https://www.mixedarticle.com/who-is-amanda-duarte

[Wezil]

So...you don't know what part of the constitution supposedly gives this right...you just know that others have argued it? Okie Dokie.

Damn! You outed me. I'm not really a scholar on the US Constitution so I read/listen to the arguments of those who are (both sides) and form an opinion based on that. I guess I could use the "I know what I know" approach but that seems pretty irresponsible.

Since you keep asking what section I am referring to can I assume you haven't heard the counter argument? If you have, then why do you keep asking a question that you already know the answer to?

[giblets]

Because people tend to be more scared of murder than accidental deaths? I looked it up once and drunk driving accounts for roughly three 9/11s each year, or did. Yet we as a nation lost our **** after the towers fell, while doing little to address drunk driving. Also the pro-life movement is a coalition assembled for one particular foe and is not necessarily going to agree on ways and means on any other, etc.

I don't think any adults are afraid they will get aborted. They're not scared, just very angry about some women choosing to terminate their pregnancies.

[Kidishious]

Buffalo Hat-Wearing Elizabeth Warren Leads Insurrection Against Supreme Court
Politics
May 4th, 2022 - BabylonBee.com


21.2k

Shares

5.4k
SHARE
4.9k
SHARE
SHARE
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Eyewitnesses reported Senator Elizabeth Warren donned a buffalo hat and led a group of bloodthirsty insurrectionists up the marble steps of the Supreme Court Building Wednesday morning. According to sources, they are outraged that the murder of babies as a constitutional right is under dispute.

Sen Warren, literally shaking, tumbled up the building steps and wailed righteously at the main door of the marble palace as her minions violently assaulted it with poster board and clothes hangers.

"The court has been compromised!" she yelled. "They are ruling in a way I disagree with!"

"America has fallen! WE DEMAND BLOOD! MORE BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!"

While rallying her supporters, Elizabeth Warren explained that overturning Roe v Wade wasn't a big deal because Congress had the power to amend the Constitution but that she was still angry anyway because she hadn't eaten in a while "AND COULD SOMEONE PLEASE GRAB ME A SNICKERS?!"

Republican leaders are reportedly concerned about the recent developments, unsure if they should point at Elizabeth Warren and laugh or worry whether continuing to oppose baby murder will make it harder for them to beat Democrats in November.

"Ugh, this is hard!" said Sen Mitch McConnel. "Politics! Ugh!"

The insurrectionists were seen walking around the Supreme Court Building with signs and flags, just like the violent insurrectionists of January 6th. They have not yet breached the building, however, as Capitol police have not opened the doors for them.

[My Wife Hates CIV]

And yeah I'm for a women's right to choose too, just not at a cost of 60 million baby lives. That's ****ing insane.

of course you didnt know about that number until you read the headline today.