Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

[Geronimo]

Also how much help did orlavs forces provide before they became the bad guys?

[Geronimo]

In 1770 there was a russian - ottoman war.

A guy named orlov came to Greece said rise up we got your back.
there was a big uprising in Greece against teh Ottoman empire. THe russians backed off left us dry, abandoned us

there was a huge massacre of greeks by the turks.

Were the russians the bad guys? they hadn't touched the hair on the head of a greek


yeah they were

Good analogy because I totally disagree and would have called the ottomans the bad guys for Greece. We can agree to disagree I guess.

Curious about whether you thought it was more important for the Greeks afterwards to counter orlavs faithless faction or the Ottoman empire in the aftermath. Which was the bigger threat? The bad guys or the Ottoman empire? Both? Divide resources evenly to oppose both?

[Geronimo]

If you want to define "the bad guys" as "can't do anything worse", then go ahead, but most of us think it's a bit reductionist.

Where do I define it as can't do anything worse? Just needed that straw man?

[Aeson]

The bad guys is a term borrowed from the language of commentary on fiction. Think of how it is used. The US foreign policy has become contemptible in its shallowness and fickleness but with respect the overall narrative of the misfortunes of Ukraine the US is not yet the bad guys.

No. Trump is acting like a street level mobster shaking down a convenience store. It's plenty to give us the appropriate label of the bad guys.

(Lying about who started the war, verbally attacking the victim, lying about how much aid was given, breaking treaties, pondering ethnic cleansing, and all the psychotic immigration crap is just extra levels of bad.)

[Aeson]

Is "we are the bad guys" really the way to convey that when discussing the Russian invasion of Ukraine? I would say "we're not the good guys in Ukraine anymore. I'm no longer certain we won't be joining the bad guys". I just want to keep it grounded especially given the huge further moral declines in US statecraft that it has become all too easy to imagine this president leaping into.

No, we are the bad guys is pretty much it. You just can't help defend what even you call indefensible.

[Bereta_Eder]

Is "we are the bad guys" really the way to convey that when discussing the Russian invasion of Ukraine? I would say "we're not the good guys in Ukraine anymore. I'm no longer certain we won't be joining the bad guys". I just want to keep it grounded especially given the huge further moral declines in US statecraft that it has become all too easy to imagine this president leaping into.

In 1770 there was a russian - ottoman war.

A guy named orlov came to Greece said rise up we got your back.
there was a big uprising in Greece against teh Ottoman empire. THe russians backed off left us dry, abandoned us

there was a huge massacre of greeks by the turks.

Were the russians the bad guys? they hadn't touched the hair on the head of a greek


yeah they were

[N35t0r]

If you want to define "the bad guys" as "can't do anything worse", then go ahead, but most of us think it's a bit reductionist.

[Geronimo]

Yes it does. YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO DEFEND OUR ACTIONS AS THOSE OF "NOT THE BAD GUYS".

The bad guys is a term borrowed from the language of commentary on fiction. Think of how it is used. The US foreign policy has become contemptible in its shallowness and fickleness but with respect the overall narrative of the misfortunes of Ukraine the US is not yet the bad guys.

[Geronimo]

whataboutrussia?

We are bad guys. Of course Russia are bad guys, even worse than us. That doesn't excuse our behavior.

Is "we are the bad guys" really the way to convey that when discussing the Russian invasion of Ukraine? I would say "we're not the good guys in Ukraine anymore. I'm no longer certain we won't be joining the bad guys". I just want to keep it grounded especially given the huge further moral declines in US statecraft that it has become all too easy to imagine this president leaping into.

[Aeson]

When I say "I simply point out that neither Trump nor the US is meaningfully "the bad guy" in Europe." that does not even imply that I think Trump's official acts are in any way defensible.

Yes it does. YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO DEFEND OUR ACTIONS AS THOSE OF "NOT THE BAD GUYS".

[Aeson]

The Budapest memorandum wasn't a treaty. I think it should be regarded as a promise but one given almost the weakest possible strength given to any pledge in international law. I am far more bothered by Trumps violation of actual treaties like the USMCA treaty or the treaties signed in association with US membership in the WTO than I am in a political agreement like the Budapest Memorandum.

I am curious if "we are the bad guys", what are the Russians? If you want to claim both are bad guys then consider this. Would you rather your country receives everything that Russia got from the US since Trump started his second term or would you rather receive everything that Ukraine got from the US in Trump's second term?

Furthermore, is India a bad guy in Ukraine? is Turkey a bad guy in Ukraine? Is the only requisite to being a bad guy a large negative decrease in generosity from the proposed "bad guy" even if the vast majority of nations remain even less generous to ukraine and more equivocal in their relations to both Russia and Ukraine than the US is under Trump?

whataboutrussia?

We are bad guys. Of course Russia are bad guys, even worse than us. That doesn't excuse our behavior.

[Dauphin]

it might work even faster if you and others simply asked me to leave instead of this rubbish.

I would request you stay. FWIW

[EPW]

Democrats are evil Republicans are evil Trump is currently very evil. Does your sarcasm intend to convey that you *don't* think the Democrats are evil? 2 parties for everything. absolute power corrupts absolutely and I'd ay the 2 parties are plenty corrupt.

For healthcare I've advocated single payer here and elsewhere repeatedly. I also see that looking through my posts I've posted more links to BBC and DW than anywhere else.

Unlike the conservative pits I post a lot in lately when I'm here I hardly ever feel moved to defend Democrats because it's very clearly preaching to the choir. I hate that. I *do* appreciate when sound logic refutes the conservative talking points I air out here and that's what brings me here. Being detested and having conservative fantasy caricatured profiles constructed about me here seems less useful. Were any details you posted about me rooted in any actual posts I made whatsoever?

I regard poly as mostly belonging to the posters If this is your way of not so subtly saying kindly leave so we can resume our circle jerk of political hyperbole fabrications I certainly will take it under advisement, but it might work even faster if you and others simply asked me to leave instead of this rubbish.

By paragraph
1. Thanks for admitting it. And to answer your question, no, I don't think the Democrats are evil.
2. Oh, I'm sure you made an offhand remark somewhere "supporting" single payer, but not before a minimum of 10,000 words attacking it or something very similar.
3.a) Oh, so you are saying my analysis is correct, but it's okay because you get off arguing with people. This does not surprise me
B) Yes. You have expressed insane conspiratorial right wing opinions about the Democrats, but it's true because you don't get your information from Fox News. Some of these views relate to Biden, Soros, election fraud and even more!
4. People are getting rounded up in the streets and sent to camps, you getting offended doesn't concern me.

[Geronimo]

You all attacking Geronimo need to remember that the Democrats are EVIL. Nothing that Trump or the Republicans do will every match the gross behavior of Bill Clinton, the malevolent machinations of Hillary Clinton, the audacity of Obama(black), Biden's son's laptop nude selfies, and GEORGE SOROS. Also remember that Geronimo gets his news from thte Wall Street Journal Op-Eds, the Hertigage Foundation (two shining beacons of American FREEDOM), and his insane MAGA real life friends. So when Geronimo posts paragraph after paragraph of what appears to be self-contradicting, thinly veiled right-wing propaganda, often barely decipherable, seemingly guided by no underlying principles except to defend the Republican party at all costs, remember he's saving us from universal health care, defending our European allies, "election fraud", environmental protection, and most importantly GEORGE SOROS. Thank you.

Democrats are evil Republicans are evil Trump is currently very evil. Does your sarcasm intend to convey that you *don't* think the Democrats are evil? 2 parties for everything. absolute power corrupts absolutely and I'd ay the 2 parties are plenty corrupt.

For healthcare I've advocated single payer here and elsewhere repeatedly. I also see that looking through my posts I've posted more links to BBC and DW than anywhere else.

Unlike the conservative pits I post a lot in lately when I'm here I hardly ever feel moved to defend Democrats because it's very clearly preaching to the choir. I hate that. I *do* appreciate when sound logic refutes the conservative talking points I air out here and that's what brings me here. Being detested and having conservative fantasy caricatured profiles constructed about me here seems less useful. Were any details you posted about me rooted in any actual posts I made whatsoever?

I regard poly as mostly belonging to the posters If this is your way of not so subtly saying kindly leave so we can resume our circle jerk of political hyperbole fabrications I certainly will take it under advisement, but it might work even faster if you and others simply asked me to leave instead of this rubbish.

[BeBMan]

Currently it looks like those so-called peace talks in Saudi Arabia are primarily about saving Russia's Black Sea Fleet and oil infrastructure