Tweet
I'm just going to consider you a Marxist from this point on.
-
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -
As usual, just more made up nonsense from Kid.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
Keep it up, and most people will just consider you a fool from this point on
Assuming they don't already
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
can i get the short layman's version of critical race theory?Comment
-
No nonsense at all. It's all there in Wikipedia. Or do you think Wikipedia is white supremacist? Oh wait, that make me even more sure that you're a Marxist.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Kind of hard because it's made to be confusing. But basically, a lot of things that you like, like probably liberalism are actually whiteness, and hurts minoritites.Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
Common themes
Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic published an annotated bibliography of CRT references in 1993, listing works of legal scholarship that addressed one or more of the following themes: "critique of liberalism"; "storytelling/counterstorytelling and 'naming one's own reality'"; "revisionist interpretations of American civil rights law and progress"; "a greater understanding of the underpinnings of race and racism"; "structural determinism"; "race, sex, class, and their intersections"; "essentialism and anti-essentialism"; "cultural nationalism/separatism"; "legal institutions, critical pedagogy, and minorities in the bar"; and "criticism and self-criticism".[85] When Gloria Ladson-Billings introduced CRT into education in 1995, she cautioned that its application required a "thorough analysis of the legal literature upon which it is based".[25]- Critique of liberalism: First and foremost to CRT legal scholars in 1993 was their "discontent" with the way in which liberalism addressed race issues in the U.S. They critiqued "liberal jurisprudence", including affirmative action,[86]color-blindness, role modeling, and the merit principle.[87] Specifically, they claimed that the liberal concept of value-neutral law contributed to maintenance of the U.S.'s racially unjust social order.[13]An example questioning foundational liberal conceptions of Enlightenment values, such as rationalism and progress, is Rennard Strickland's 1986 Kansas Law Review article, "Genocide-at-Law: An Historic and Contemporary View of the Native American Experience". In it, he "introduced Native American traditions and world-views" into law school curriculum, challenging the entrenchment at that time of the "contemporary ideas of progress and enlightenment". He wrote that U.S. laws that "permeate" the everyday lives of Native Americans were in "most cases carried out with scrupulous legality" but still resulted in what he called "cultural genocide".[88]In 1993, David Theo Goldberg described how countries that adopt classical liberalism's concepts of "individualism, equality, and freedom"—such as the United States and European countries—conceal structural racism in their cultures and languages, citing terms such as "Third World" and "primitive".[89]: 6–7 In 1988, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw traced the origins the New Right's use of the concept of color-blindness from 1970s neoconservative think tanks to the Ronald Reagan administration in the 1980s.[50] She described how prominent figures such as neoconservative scholars Thomas Sowell[61] and William Bradford Reynolds,[90] who served as Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division from 1981 to 1988,[90] called for "strictly color-blind policies."[61] Sowell and Reynolds, like many conservatives at that time, believed that the goal of equality of the races had already been achieved, and therefore the race-specific civil rights movement was a "threat to democracy".[61] The color-blindness logic used in "reverse discrimination" arguments in the post-civil rights period is informed by a particular viewpoint on "equality of opportunity", as adopted by Sowell,[91] in which the state's role is limited to providing a "level playing field", not to promoting equal distribution of resources.Crenshaw claimed that "equality of opportunity" in antidiscrimination law can have both an expansive and a restrictive aspect.[91] Crenshaw wrote that formally color-blind laws continue to have racially discriminatory outcomes.[14] According to her, this use of formal color-blindness rhetoric in claims of reverse discrimination, as in the 1978 Supreme Court ruling on Bakke, was a response to the way in which the courts had aggressively imposed affirmative action and busing during the Civil Rights era, even on those who were hostile to those issues.[50] In 1990, legal scholar Duncan Kennedy described the dominant approach to affirmative action in legal academia as "colorblind meritocratic fundamentalism". He called for a postmodern "race consciousness" approach that included "political and cultural relations" while avoiding "racialism" and "essentialism."[92]Sociologist Eduardo Bonilla-Silva describes this newer, subtle form of racism as "color-blind racism", which uses frameworks of abstract liberalism to decontextualize race, naturalize outcomes such as segregation in neighborhoods, attribute certain cultural practices to race, and cause "minimization of racism".[93]In his influential 1984 article, Delgado challenged the liberal concept of meritocracy in civil rights scholarship.[94] He questioned how the top articles in most well-established journals were all written by white men.[95]
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
More nonsense from Kid... Just making up stuff because he has nothing real to say.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
Just more proof that people should consider you a fool...Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Here's another source Ming. You like to get your info from a lot of sources right?Originally posted by Ming View Post
What is Critical Race Theory?
An outgrowth of the European Marxist school of critical theory, critical race theory is an academic movement which seeks to link racism, race, and power. Unlike the Civil Rights movement, which sought to work within the structures of American democracy, critical race theorists challenge the very foundations of the liberal order, such as rationalism, constitutional law, and legal reasoning. Critical race theorists argue that American social life, political structures, and economic systems are founded upon race, which (in their view) is a social construct.
Systemic racism, in the eyes of critical race theorists, stems from the dominance of race in American life. Critical race theorists and anti-racist advocates argue that, because race is a predominant part of American life, racism itself has become internalized into the American conscience. It is because of this, they argue, that there have been significantly different legal and economic outcomes between different racial groups.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Typical Kid... Just more made up BS from Kid.
I haven't said A THING ABOUT CRITICAL RACE THEORY.
I was and will continue to laugh at your lame attempts to label me a Marxist.
And that's why people are probably thinking you are a fool...
But keep trying your lame, make believe what others have said...
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Kind of funny that you think these tricks fool anyone.Originally posted by Ming View Post
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Please quote ANYTHING I HAVE SAID ABOUT CRITICAL RACE THEORY in this thread... oh that's right, you can't.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
It's not really that you think drop boxes prevent cheating. It's that if anyone says we need to take out the drop box system you accuse them of trying to prevent black people from voting, which is implying that people are white supremacist. That's why no one believes you.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Oh man. You almost fooled me there. It's true that you didn't say anything about Critical Race Theory! You almost fooled me into believing that you don't support Critical Race Theory.Originally posted by Ming View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Please quote where I have ever supported Critical Race Theory... oh that's right, you can't.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
Just more BS from Kid...Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
smhI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
Comment